10-28-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Cit,.y of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. NO. 5. For the entire plat of Kelly Cove, including Lots 1 thru 4 and Out.lot A, the standard lakeshore hardcover limitations are not exceeded as a result of the proposed garage construction. Existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone is 0%. Existing hardcover in t'-e 75-250' zone is approximately 12,750 square feet or 21%, with no change resulting from the garage construction. Existing hardcover in the 250'-500' zone is approximately 5125 square feet or 20%. Addition of the 528 square feet garage will increase this to 5653 square feet or 22%, where 30% is allowable. 6. The proposea garage is screened from the traveled roadway of Kelley Avenue by numerous trees and shrubs. 7. The proposed garage will be owned by the Navarre Cove Homeowners Association and is intended to 'oe leased only to the owners of the 4 residential units on Lots 1 thru 4, and shall in part be used for storage of tho Association's grounds maintenance equipment. 8. Municipal Zoning Code Sectio.. 10.32 which regulates Plan^ed Residential Developments (. .,) does not prohibit the construction of accessory structur - withina PRD. Section 10.32 Subdivision 6 generally requires approval by the Council for the lr * of pr( i.osed buildings. 9. The garage in .question is accessory to the four residential units w; thin this PRD, hence it meets the intent of zoning code Section 10.03 Subdivision 9(A). The ant of 10.03 9(A) is to allow accessory structures on properties where a resident occupies the property in to oversee the use and maintenance of such ac. -)ry structures. 10. The City Council has considered this 3pplicati.on includ g the findings and recommendations of the Planni.rg Commission, reports by City staf f , comments by the applicant and the effect `, the proposed variance on the nealth, safety and welfare of the community. The Ci ty Counci 1 f inds that the condit ions exist ing on Lhis property are peculiar to it and do not apply gener, lY to `err property in this zoning district; that gran the iance would not adversely affect traffic cone _:ns, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other dan .- to neighr)oring property; wo,ild not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or c7ifficulty; is necessary to preserve a sustant.ial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of ;.`ie Zoning Code and Comprehensive clan of the City. Page 2 -)f 5