Laserfiche WebLink
.} _ r�r�ETING <br />TO: C jncil Members r��� <br />FROM: M Gael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Admi��4t'E4� 5 <br />DATE: October 23, <br />1985 <br />Uf *� ' <br />OF WN0 <br />SUBJECT: #971, Mark <br />S. Wasserman, <br />1045 Linden Lane - <br />Variance <br />Zoning District - LR - <br />1B, 1 acre <br />Application - request to replace foundation under existing non- <br />conforming garage. <br />LIST OF EXHIBITS <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Survey Submitted <br />E - Survey of neighboring property showing exact location of <br />subject garage. <br />The applicant is requesting to replace the foundation under <br />his existing 2-car garage. The foundation walls are leaning and will <br />bec , hazardous if left much longer. The garage opens onto Linden <br />Lane, just before the street deadends. <br />The standard for garages located with doors facing F�.reets is <br />a 30' setback, and in the LR - 1B district, for any garage located in <br />the street ya A.d of a lakeshore lot, the standard setback is 35' from the <br />property line. The existing garage is approximately 12'-141from the <br />right -if -way, and approximately 26' from the paved road surface. The <br />traf. on Linden Lane is minimal, and it is not likely that it will ever <br />be a through street based on the fully developed land use surrounding <br />it. There is room to park a car in f ront of the garage without sticking <br />out into the traveled road, and there is no problem with sight distance. <br />The hardship in relocating the garage is that any relocation <br />would place the garage downhill, leaving a steep grade for the <br />driveway, obviously not desirable from a safety and maintenance <br />standpoint. <br />Note also that the garage is, at the closest point, 5.6 feet <br />from the side lot line. The Planning Commission, at their October <br />21st meeting, asked the applicant whether the garage could be moved to <br />maintain a 10' side setback. Applicant noted this would likely disrupt <br />his existing driveway to the inunediate south of the ;arage. Planning <br />Commission recommended approval of replacement of the garage <br />foundation in the existing location. <br />Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution draft. <br />