Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THX. .1EGULAR ORONO COUNCII, MEETING HELD AUGUST 12, 1985. PAGE 4 <br />#876 DEAN i NANCY 14ONGE <br />3444 EASTLAKE STREET <br />VARIANCE - FURTHER REVIEW <br />Dean Monge was present for this hearing. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the applicants' <br />proposed re -designed patio which would encroach the 0-75' <br />setback by 5 feet, and exce!ed_,g hardcover limits. <br />Mayor Butler felt that due to the circumstances of the <br />applicant's being caught in the middle of this matter, and <br />realizing the applicants' preference for the existing patio <br />and shape, she questioned whether it would be possible to <br />keep the octagon patio design and would be willing to give a <br />little on the encroachment of the 0-75' zone. <br />Asst. Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that if the <br />octagon shaped patio were used it would encroach the 0-75' <br />zone by approximately 91in a limited area. <br />Councilmember Adams stated that in other cases, property <br />owners with much stronger rationale and aes*hetic arguments <br />have been made to conform with hardcover limits within the 0- <br />751. <br />Mayor Butler stated that the circumstances of this being a <br />piece of property forr.,erly owned by a commercial enterprise <br />and sold to the applicant as is, makes this a special case. <br />Councilmember Frahm stated because of the uniqueness of this <br />property he would give within the 75-250' zone but feels <br />uncomfortable of giving any leeway in the 0-75' zone because <br />the builder directly went against what he was told by the <br />City. <br />Council unanimously agreed that if this was an initial <br />request by the property owner to construct this type of <br />hardcover within the 0-75' zone, it would have been denied. <br />Planning Commission Representative J. Diann Goetten stated <br />that because of the special cir•..-4tances, the <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission. - only remove <br />the sidewalk within the 0-75' in front of thy_ , :�tio and leave <br />the existing patio and sidewalk to house as Again, it <br />was noted that if this had been an initial request, the <br />Planning Commission would have recommended denial. <br />Mr. Monge stated that although the re -designed patio is not <br />as desirable as the existing patio, they would rather take <br />the re -designed patio than no patio at all. <br />it was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor <br />Butler, to authorize staff to draft a resolution granting <br />permission for the proposed 12'x18' rectangular patio and <br />adjoining sidewalk as recommended by staff, and setting a <br />deadline date of September 30, 1985 to removed existing patio <br />and sidewalk to lake. Motion, Ayes (2), Nays (1). <br />Councilmember Frahm voted nay. <br />