Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 17, 1985. PAGE 3 <br />#876 ASPLUND Goetten stated that with the development of this property the <br />(Cont.) criteria was already established by the Council for this <br />development. Goetten asked when the criteria was <br />established for this ;)roperty, was anything put in writing <br />regarding the lakeshore development standards. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the standards for <br />lakeshore development were set out in the resolution along <br />with the special setbacks approved for this site. Mabusth <br />noted that in that resolution it was noted that all lakeshore <br />development standards would apply. <br />Chairman Callahan summarized the proposal for 3424 Eastlake <br />Street. Callahan explained that the applicant is willing to <br />remove the patios up to the 75' setback line. Callahan <br />stated that the applicant wants to put a rectangular piece of <br />concrete between the porch (proposed 10' x 10' ) c�nd the bay <br />window. Callahan stated that new informatior submitted <br />notes that the applicant has placed plastic underneath <br />landscaping fence line. Callahan stated that staff has <br />noted that a certif icate of occupancy has not been issued for <br />the home so it is possible to require the applicant to conform <br />to the overall hardcover requirements. Callahan asked that <br />the Planning Commission address the screened porch and <br />portion of patio. <br />Rovegno asked staff if poking holes in the plastic would make <br />the area non -hardcover. <br />Assistant Zonine Administrator Gaffron stated that Council <br />did accept that in another application. <br />Randy Asplund noted that he has already spent $3,500 in <br />landscaping and to tear up the rock would cost another <br />$1,000. <br />Chairman Callahan stated that the credit may not be feasible <br />since this property is already overbuilt. <br />Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to deny the applicant's <br />after -the -fact variance and request the applicant to do the <br />following: <br />1. Applicant is to remove all hardcover between the 0-75' <br />setback area and the City to hold the line at 151 <br />hardcover between the 75-250' setback area. <br />2. Applicant to remove all plastic materials underneath any <br />landscaping. <br />3. Rectangular piece of concrete to be rert,ovvd also. <br />Motion, Ayes (2), Nays (5). lkmbers Kelley and Callahan <br />vote aye because the property is being( vt.•r ut I l i zei in a tuc. <br />acre z)ne. W,tion failed. <br />