My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
07-22-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 11:28:00 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 11:21:24 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 22, 1985. PAGE 2 <br />i852 STANLEY GREGORY <br />1410 SBORLINE DR. <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE <br />Mr. Greg Kopischke of Westwood Planning & Engineering Co. was <br />present to represent Stanley Gregory. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issues of the <br />applicants' request to alter wetlands for decorative and <br />wildlife ponds which would require a conditional use permit <br />and a variance. Bernhardson stated the main considerations <br />are establishing a baseline of monitoring concepts, remedial <br />securities for future problems, use of spoils, and the <br />environmental compatibility of skimmers etc. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the proposed plan with <br />the Council. Mabusth stated that the DNR approves of the <br />wildlife pond but has agreed to grant a permit subject to <br />approval by the City of Orono. Mabusth stated that the <br />Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Corp of Engineers <br />have also approved this plan. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Planning <br />Commission has recommended approval of the wildlife pond as a <br />test case to be monitored for an undertimed period of time. <br />Councilmember Adams indicated his concerns for the type of <br />corrective action to be taken if problems arise. Adams <br />stated that definite monitoring and securities should be <br />required. <br />Councilmember Frahm suggested a moritorium on future ponds <br />until the impact results are determined. Frahm also <br />suggested that before undergoing this project, a base <br />testing period of approximately one year should be done in <br />order to have something to compare with future monitoring. <br />Regaiding the use of spoils, Zoning Administrator Mabusth <br />stated that Dr. Hanson, of the FWBI, recommends using it for <br />fertilizer. <br />Greg Kopischke stated that they needed to determine what are <br />reasonable standards for a monitoring plan and possible <br />remedies. <br />Councilmember Grabek stated that the landowner should have a <br />definite plan for testing and securing the project if changes <br />must be made and the costs should be incurred by the <br />applicant. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth reiterated the need for a base <br />testing period because there are not enough facts regarding <br />the present status of the water quality as it leaves wetland <br />for main lake. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.