07-08-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

*!r. Dick Carl's violations are another exccllent example of the favors being handed out by a cou2)le of our City Councilmen. Mr. Carl's violations were as good a swept under the rug by them at the last meeting. First of all, Mr. Carl MUST apply for a 10' side lot -line setback var- iance for his storage shed- -" 1 MTTER WHAT SIZE IT IS. In addition, a hardcover ca_.,ulation is in order for 3Ir. Carl's property if it is in order for anyones. lie is clearly in violation of our hardcover restrictions and his shed is ONLY A SMALL P011TIO OF PTS ITAP..-UOVET. VIO- LATI ON . Even more stunning, when it comes to favors being handed out, was the way everyone "played" deaf when I pointed out that the City's own pictures showed that a motor - vehicle was ALSO 13EI1\G PARKED ON MR. CABLIS AND 1M. J01INSOVS GRAVELI If '1Y gravel becomes hardcover just because I park a motorvehicle on it ---- SO DOLS THEIRSII They are clearly violating the law ---- IF I A*III The facts spear: for themselves. Rationalizations and excuses will not make the facts any different. In all cases, *!r. Johnson and fir. Carl must be required to come in for "after the fact" variances any' to pay the higher penalty fees required. To do otherti.iso would be illegal favoritism and a shirking of this city's legal responsibilities. If the city continues this "charade" against me, I will hold the city accountable for any favoritism shown to any other KNOWN violators. Common sense dictates that this city is fully aware that my ALLEGED violation is but "the tip of the iceberg"; an iceberg consisting of many far more obviously flagrant Violations, CLEARLY K`:O.iN TO THE CITY AND ALL OF ITS HGPKESEKTATIVES. Legally speak- ing, my gravel should never have been included in the hardcover calculations "contracturally" placed against my home. My {*ravel is not hardcover and everyone knows it. For the legal record, I ar► not personally making any com- plaint against anyone else on this block other than Mr. Carl and Mr. Johnson. I am simply rernindin7 you, formally, of that ►,•hich you already know regardinp the general non- compliance on Crystal Bay lid. Any attempt by the City of Orono or any of it's representatives, to imply that I have issued a complaint against anyone other than them (Johnson and Carl) would be false and treated by me as an Intention- al tort. t"ith the knowledge you already possess, you are neglir,ently lone overdue to act.