07-08-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#932 Edwards Page 3 June 24, 1985 3) The lot width of 125' is greater than 80% of the required 140' width, so no formal lot width variance i5 required. 4) The drainage from the house should all be directed toward the lagoon in order to gain the max.LMVM inf iltration time and distance. 5) Based on item 4, the hardcover in the lagoon 75-190' zone is requested to be 4,940 square fe• r 34.4%, requesting a 9.4% variance for a new home. 6) Applicant should not be penalized for the existing driveway hardcover in the lagoon 0-75' zone, and in fact his drivway proposal minimizes the additional driveway hardcover required. 7 ) As long as the 75-250' zone on the north side of the lagoon stays non -hardcover, the applicant's overall 75-250' hardcover is less than 25%. Would you consider this as negating the need for a hardcover variance? Of course, it would mean that if the northerly portion is ever divided off, it suddenly increases the hardcover percent or he lakeshore building site. 8) The neighbors' request for the setback variance to allow for the least disruptive sightlines, to maintain uniformity, and the capability to direct all drainage over 100' of relatively flat lawn area, would seem to justify the granting of a variance to the lakeshore setback. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the lakeshore setback and hardcover variances based on these findings: 1) No permanent crediting of the land north of the lagoon is required. 2) No lot width variance is required since the 125' lot width meets 80% or more of the 140' requirement. 3) Based on all drainage from the proposed house being directed toward the lagoon, the hardcover in the lagoon 75-190' zone is requested to be 4,940 square feet or 34.4%, or a 9.4% variar- . (Technically, if all areas on the entire property within 0-75' and ' - 250' of the lake are considered, the applicant would be allowed approximately 8,281 square feet of hardcover, with 75-250' total hardcover requested at 3380 square feet or10.2%, and requesting 0-75' total hardcover of 2,960 square feet, including the existing driveway, or 10.5%.) 4) Applicant should not be penalized for the existing driveway hardcover in the lagoon 0-75' zone, and in fact his driveway proposal minimizes the additional driveway hardcover required. 5) The neighbors' request for the lakeshore setback and average setback variances to allow for the least disruptive sightlines, to maintain uniformity, and the capability to direct all drainage over 100' of relatively flat lawn area, would seem to justify the granting of a variance to the lakeshore setback.