My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
05-28-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 10:34:54 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 10:24:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P:1ciC <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NC <br />3) :Tact E, the developed lot is also deficient in regards <br />to lot area requirements as follows: <br />Tract E's area exclusive of road casement per Section <br />31.20; is 1.4 acres - short 26,136 sf or 30% <br />4) Combined Tracts C At D, R.L.S. 96 and combined Tract E & F, <br />R.L.G. 96 have been owned in common by Anderson from May 23, <br />19-56 to the present. <br />5) Tracts C, D, E, and F were owned in common by Sam Houston <br />Hkl`:rian and Florence Margaret Huffman since October 14, <br />1952 at the time of the replatting of Lot 4 and 4A Auditor's <br />Subdivision Number 356. <br />6) Vacant Tracts C and D are used as lawn area and additional <br />lake access for the existing residence on combined Tracts <br />E and F. With this use and with the lots in common ownership, <br />the four lots combined meet all the District zoning requirements. <br />7) A new hone: on :Tact C would require an additional curh cut <br />•:n a section of Shoreline Drive that is heavily trafficked <br />and already has an excessive number )" lccesses serving <br />e::isting houses. <br />3) moth Tracts C and E have been zoned for a minimum lot <br />size of 2 acres Since Ordinance No. 172 in 1974 at which <br />tirre the two lots were held in common ownership by Alden <br />i,. :%ndlerson and Helen I•:. Anderson and which lots combined <br />met the requirements of this zoning density. <br />9) Denial of *.hz! subject variances would not constitute a taking <br />of Froperty or loss of substantial value because Tract C has <br />always had value and been used as required area and yard <br />space for the residence on Tract E. <br />10) Section 31.203 of the zoning code provides for development <br />of lots of record of greater than one acre held in separate <br />ownership since pricy to the effective date of the zoning <br />regulations. Tracts C and D do not conform to this section <br />because tFiey were in co,►:rc;n ownership with Tracts E and F <br />since 1974 to the present. <br />11) The City Council has alwayo required that when two or more <br />lots are own,�-d in common, each lot must individually meet <br />or exceed the requirements of the Zoning Code before any <br />of the lots can be built upon and that two, or more substandard <br />lots owned in common must be combined so that the resulting <br />combined lot meets the requirements of th•2 Zoning Code before <br />the lots can tic built upc•n. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.