05-28-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LMCD Board Minutes April 24, 1985 Page 2 10. Seahorse Condominium - approval of the 1985 renewal application, with minor change. The committee also (a) reviewed the summary sheet of the dock DOCK regulations, and recommended approval; (b) accepted the residential SUM4ARY boat storage study for further review and discussion; and (c) recommended a public hearing on the 1986 deicing program. Bauman Moved, Elam Seconded that the committee report be accepted. Motion, Ayes [121, Nays [0). Elam Moved, Hurr Seconded that the 1985 amended dock license for SCHMITT Schmitt Marina be approved as stipulated. Mcti,�.,, Ayes f12), AMENDMENT Nays [0). Hurr Moved, Bauman Seconded that the new dock license request PARK HILL of P.rk Hill North Apartments for seven WAU be approved, subject NORTH NEW to placing she slips in the inlet contiguous to the existing Park LICENSE Hill West dockage. Motion, Ayes [12), Nays [0]. De ,,chaux Moved, Gisvold Seconded that the following renewal dock license applications be approved, subject to village response and stipulations: Bay Shore Manor Condominium Homeowners Assn., Inc. Excelsior Bay Associates, Inc. 1985 Hennepin County at Spring Park RENEWAL Lord Fletchers of the Lake LICENSES Maple Crest Estates Village of Minnetonka Beach Seahorse Condominium Association (minor change) Surfside, Inc. Motion, Ades 1131, Nays 10). Wartman appeared before the Board and reviewed his request for a new dock license at Winston Estates, a new residential development on Cideons Bay (north shore). A hearing had been held at which the panel found that further submittals were needed before concep- tual approval could be considered. The additional material had since been submitted (a shoreline survey showing 2,660' including lagoon frontage, a new dock plan, a letter of amendment indicating water depths, easement lines, and Tonka Bay's approval letter), and Wartman's amended application was for 53 WAU. At the Board meeting questions arose as to whether or not Lot I had access to proposed dockage on the west finger of the lagoon, since the westerly property line seemed obscured in relation to the lagoon's west side line; if the lagoon finger is not contiguous to the property, the city would grant access via its adjacent road, but the frontage of the development would be reduced as well as the total number of WAUs for the development.