My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
05-28-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 10:34:54 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 10:24:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1985 PAGE 4 <br />Mayor Butler argued that the Art Center will probably appeal <br />anyway regardless of how many units they are assessed. <br />Michelle Combs of 1251 Briar Street noted that the Art Center <br />is saying that they don't need sewer and many Crystal Bay <br />residents said the same thing but that the project has still <br />been ordered. Combs stated that if in the future the Art <br />Center needs sewer, they wouldn't be paying any construction <br />costs and would only have to pay hookup charges, and the <br />Crystal Bay residents in effect would have paid their hookup <br />charges. <br />Mayor Butler explained that anytime a new sewer project is <br />put in, the law dictate-3 that you will hookup within 16 months <br />after the system has been declared ready for hookups. <br />Butler noted that if in thn fLiture the Art Center hooked up to <br />sewer they would still t,a j the same assessment but with an <br />inflation factor built into the till and could be higher than <br />what the Crystal Bay residents paid. <br />Craig Christensen of 1251 Brown Road South asked if the Art <br />Center was to expand and the City was to assess the Art Center <br />more units, would that money be credi41-:.4 to the Crystal Bay <br />Sewer Project and reduce the residents as5,�ssment fee. <br />Mayor Butler explained that it the Art Center was to be <br />assessed in the future, that money would go into Z-he sewer <br />operating fund and would not reduc- `hey residents <br />assessments. <br />Susan Enrieht, Art Center representative, asked the City to <br />clarify the reason for the inclusion of the Art Center. <br />Mayor Butler explained that when the City first, considered <br />the Art Center to be included in the project, i:he City was <br />seeking federal funding. Butler stated that a survey was <br />done of the Crystal Bay area in order to determine their level <br />of need and it was discovered through that survey that the <br />majority of the households qualify as low and moderate <br />income, and as a result were eligible for state/federal <br />funding. Butler stated that the funding was not available <br />and the City spent many years seeking this funding. Butler <br />indicated that after the City found out the funding was not <br />available, the Art Center was included in the project. <br />Councilmember Frahm stated that the City tries to get <br />commercial operations to hookup when they abut sewer <br />projects because of their more intense use of property. <br />Councilmember L. Adams stated that there alsowas a question <br />of contamination of ground water with the Art Center with the <br />chemicals that the Art. Center sometimes uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.