My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
05-28-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 10:34:54 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 10:24:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINU` FS OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1985 PAGE 3 <br />sizable sum. Gray informed the Council that the Art Center <br />may have to close if such an assessment is approved and <br />assessed to the Art Center. Gray explained that the Art <br />Center has been operating for 32 years and may not be able to <br />continue. Gray stated that classes are veld for only about 3 <br />hours and the facilities are no` heavily used. Gray noted <br />that a septic system installer came to the Art Center to <br />analyze the system which revealed that the Art Center has an <br />adequate system and does not need sewer. Gray read and <br />submitted a letter objecting to the proposed co.;struct'ion of <br />the easement and assessment (letter attached to these <br />minutes). <br />Curtis Quady of 1223 Brown Road South asked for the logic on <br />the part of the City reducing MWCC's 24 units to 10 units for <br />any reason. Quady noted that single occupants of homes have <br />to pay the full assessment and the Art Center should have to <br />also pay the full assessment. Quady stated that many years <br />ago the community of Crystal Bay paid for that old school <br />indirectly and it has grown since then and will continue to <br />grow. Quady felt that the City should not pull numbers out <br />of the air to assess the Art Center but abide by what the MWCC <br />dictates. <br />City Engineer Cook explained that basically the present use <br />of the Art Center justifies 10 units. Cook noted that if any <br />expansion on the part of the Art Center occurred, the Art <br />Center would have to approach the City and if needed, the City <br />could assign extra units at that time. Cook asked Building & <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth if the Art Center could sell the <br />property with a different proposed use. <br />Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Art <br />Center would have to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for a <br />differ-:nt use of the property. <br />Marion Gray mentioned that in February they were required by <br />the MWCC to prepare a list of capacity of the Art Center's <br />facilities and a daily average use. Gray explained that the <br />MWCC doesn't take into consideration the use of the Art <br />Center but only how many people can f it into one roorr. Gray <br />noted that membership has declined and is doubtful that it <br />will rise again because of the number of women returning to <br />the work force. <br />Gary Printup of 1261 Briar Street corament.ed that he read <br />something in the newspaper that the Art Center has paid off <br />its mortgage. Printup stated that the Art Center could <br />re.nortgage the Art Center to help pay for the SAC and hookup <br />charges. Printup asked the Council if it would not make more <br />srnse to assess the Art Center 24 units at 100% and allow the <br />Art Center to appeal. the process just like each individual <br />home owner is having to do. Printup noted that the judge <br />should make the decision as to how many units to assess the Art <br />Center. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.