My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
05-28-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 10:34:54 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 10:24:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AI1101, 15, 1985 PAGE 8 <br />#908 JON SCHERVEN Taylor suggested using the same conditions as in the Beck <br />Resolution 41687 as follows: <br />1. The guest apartment is for use of family members only. <br />2. This guest apartment use may not be conveyed to any <br />purchaser of the property. <br />3. The guest apartment may not be rented out. <br />4. This use is subject to City review at the end of four <br />years. <br />Jon Scherven stated that he will need more than four years as <br />his parents plea to retire there. Scherven noted that the <br />house needs upgrading and he proposes to do that. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth asked if there was a separate <br />entrance to the guest apartment use. <br />Jon Scherven stated that there is the main entrance to the <br />vestibule and then a door leading downstairs and a door <br />leading to the upper level. of the house. <br />Rovegno noted that this would be like a duplex on a quarter of <br />an acre. Rovengo felt that this was not enough area. <br />Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 10:00 p.m. <br />Taylor move, Sime seconded, to recommend approval of the <br />variance based on the hardship of the location of the <br />existing building and that such approval of variance is <br />subject to removal of an equivalent amount of existing <br />hardcover and the deck may not have concrete undernen ;,h the <br />deck if it extends into the 0-75' setback area and to further <br />recommend that the applicant be required to pay the fee for a <br />conditional use permit subiect to the following: <br />1. The guest apartment is for use of family members only. <br />2. This guest apartment use may not be conveyed to a <br />purchaser of the property. <br />3. The guest apartment may not be rented out and such to be <br />confirmed by staff yearly. <br />4. This use is subject to City review at the end of four <br />years. <br />Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (1). Planning Commission member <br />Rovegno voted nay. Rovegno felt that the property did not <br />have adequate area to support a second dwelling unit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.