Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NG HELD APRI I. 15, 1985 PAGE 7 <br />1907 JAMI'S RIGHAM 1. Total hardcover within the lakeshore setback area wil <br />be 3.3% within the 0-75' setback area and 39.7% within <br />the 75-250' setback area. <br />2. Applicant has worked very hard .in improving the run off <br />with the terracing of the yard. <br />3. Applicant has recently installed a septic system in <br />November, 19£,4. <br />4. Staff draft a resolution to be filed in the chain of title <br />noting the septic situation and cautioning a future <br />owner about the possible septic problems. <br />5. Applicant's proposal is the only place to expand on the <br />lot because of the topography of the land. <br />6. Conditions 1, 2 and 5 of previous Resolution #1600 be <br />completed in a timely manner. <br />7. No future variances will be granted based on the <br />limitations of the property. <br />Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />�#908 JON SCHERVEN <br />�2649 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />9:25 - 10:00 PM Jon and Al Scherven were prf:-;ent. Chairman Callahan <br />announced that now was the time and place for the public <br />hearing concerning Jon Scherven's variance. Assistant <br />Zoning Administrator Gaffror noted the certificate of <br />mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one <br />present from the public for this application. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the <br />applicant is proposing to build a two-story addition over the <br />existing concrete slab and deck on the lake side of his <br />parents home. Gaff ron noted that in tre construction plans <br />a second kitchen is proposed to act as a second dwelling unit <br />that his parents would live in. Gaffron noted that the <br />applicant proposed equal amounts of hardcover tradeoff. <br />Rovegno noted that he has no problem with the variance <br />because of the trade of f factor but that he has a problem with <br />the conditional use permit because the property does not have <br />adequate area to support a second dwelling unit. <br />Kelley felt that the City could place the same restrictions <br />on Schervci's application as they did in the Beck's <br />applicatiot— Kelley felt that the resolution should be <br />filed in the chain of title and require that the conditional <br />use permit not transfer to a new owner. <br />