My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
06-24-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 10:14:06 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 10:08:32 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD JUNE 24, 1985. PAGE 11 <br />URDINANCE INTERPRETATION <br />iCONT. ) <br />City Attorney Radio noted that a public hearing would still <br />have to be held. Radio felt that staff should identify those <br />type of cases that staff feels would be appropriate within <br />staffs skill level and bring back to Council for their <br />review. Radio noted that a ::ode change would probably be <br />necessary. <br />Councilmember Frahm suggested calling it something else <br />rather than a variance but still get a resolution f iled in the <br />chain of title. <br />City Attorney Radio suggested calling this type of action a <br />code interpretation or staf: interpretation. <br />John Purdy asked Council what he should do. <br />Council advised Purdy that he should apply for a variance or <br />wait for Council's decision regarding the discussion held <br />tonight and for Council's performance star lards set up for <br />staff's interpretation. <br />Councilmember L. Adams stated that the resolution could be <br />called "Council affirmation of staff's decision" and be <br />placed on Council agenda. Adams felt that. staff should have <br />additional authority. Adams explained that. the Planning <br />Commission is confused about the charges in hardcover made by <br />the Council and the Planning Commission needs and desires <br />clarification of the hardcover. Adams noted two itFms that <br />they were confused on which was landscaping with rock with <br />plastic underneath with holes poked in it which Planning <br />Commission tends to interpret as non -hardcover. Adams <br />noted they also were confused with decking less than 18" from <br />the ground with sand base (considered non -hardcover), <br />within the 0-75' mark in which the Planning Commission <br />interpreted as hardcover in which the Council has <br />interepreted as non -hardcover. Adams stated which way the <br />water breaks does nct make a difference to him in calculating <br />the hardcover. Adams also asked about swimming pools if <br />they are considered hardcover. Adams noted that the FWBI <br />should respond to the fertilizer and wheth_r it. is damaging <br />to the lake. <br />Councilmember Grabek asked staff to check with the FWBI to <br />get answers on the affect of various hardcovc - techniques *m <br />the Lakeshore. Grabek felt the FWBI should address plastic <br />under decking or decking with a sand base, fertilizer for <br />lawns, ground water supply, and the many other issues <br />discussed tonight. Grabek suggested inviting Dr. Hanson to <br />the Council to give answers to these questions. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson noted the Spence letter and <br />asked Counci l whether to ask the applicant to come in for a <br />variance to teplace a non -conforming shed on the existing <br />foundat icn. Berrihardscpn noted that Srx,r,ct�'s argum rit was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.