Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE RI:GULJIR ORONO COUNCIL, M1:1•:TING 111•:LD JUN1: 24, 19f3S. PAGE; 11 <br />ORDINANCE CLARIFICATION <br />(C0NT. ) <br />Art Finkelstein of !740 Shadywood Road stated that in his <br />case he wants to take out a strip of grass 5' x 20'. <br />Finkelstein asked the Council why they will not let their <br />professional staff interpret what hardcover is and what is <br />not and allow the;: to make equal tradeoffs. Finkelstein <br />noted thatstaff is technically able to interpret the <br />ordinances of the City except under circumstances that are <br />clearly confusing in which Council must decide. <br />Mayor Butler noted that when the allowed hardcover is reached <br />and an excess of hardcover is requested then it is beyond <br />staff's purview. <br />Art Finkelstein noted that staff should be ab.e to make equal <br />tradeoffs regardless of whether the pror,&rty is over the <br />allowed hardcover. Finkelstein notec'.that the ordinance is <br />vague and should be clarified. <br />Councilmember L. Adams noted that he finds the hardcover <br />ordinance one of the only clear cut ordinances in the book. <br />Adams noted that what is considerd hardcover has been <br />changing as a result of the new technology recently <br />introduced to the City. Adams noted that the ordinance <br />intent is to reduce runoff into the lake. Adams noted what <br />is not explained in the hardcover ordinance is the intent to <br />increase absorption into the ground water. Adam.. noted that <br />the Planning Commission needs guidance on exactly what <br />Council considers as hardcover. Adams felt that pools are <br />hardcover because they eliminate absorption in the area of <br />ground where the pool covers. Adams felt that staff should <br />have more authority but that Council must decide perimeters. <br />Councilmember Gra' -�k asked how the City originally came � <br />with the 25% hardcover allowed number. <br />Building 6 Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that when the <br />hardcover ordinance was drafted it was designed to help <br />drainage. Mabusth noted that extensive studies were done at <br />the Freshwater Biological Institute (FWBI) and that <br />Council's decision was based on those studies. Mabusth <br />stated that Council would ask on all hardcover variance <br />requests if the proposal would help the drainage on the <br />property and that the allowed percentages were to be used as a <br />quage. Mabusth noted that the Purdy request is a classic <br />example of the intent cif the ordinance in consideration of <br />the existing drainage pattern. Mabusth stated that staff <br />felt comfortable making equal tradeoffs on a staff level <br />without. bringing them to Council, but noted that the <br />documentation of a variance. review (filing 01,2 resolution in <br />the chain of title) is also a factor for consideration. <br />Mayer Butler suggested staff act on a staff level and then <br />draft a rc•solut i()n in these cases and place them on a Consent. <br />Ago nda f car Ccuric• i l , ppi ovta l . <br />