Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 5 October 6, 1994 Zoning File #1967 Staff's recommended solution was to create a private road outlot (Outlot B) in the potential road location through Lot 1. This also left a small parcel (Outlot A) adjacent to the Geffre property, which would be combined with Geffre's residence parcel if Outlot B was indeed used as a road right-of-way in the future. Olson's remaining 14 acres is designated as Outlot C with the understanding that it may not be developed for even one single family residence without future City approval. This delays the payment of park fees for the 14 acres until it is further developed. Staff further recommended that the Geffre property be included in the plat (see Exhibit B) and a triangular outlot matching a pre-existing access easement be platted to provide a complete outlot connection from Bayside Road to Outlot C. Applicants proposed plat diverges from this recommendation by omitting Geffre from the subdivision, and proposes the City's acceptance of a development agreement between Olson, K-P Properties, and Geffre (see Exhibit C). Geffre Property -Easement vs. Outlot The agreement (Exhibit C) indicates that if Outlot C is replatted to buildable lots and Outlot B is used for a road, then Geffre will receive Outlot A in exchange for becoming a part of that future plat and creating a triangular outlot to complete the road connection through the southeast corner of Geffre' s property. Conversely, if the White property is acquired and a future road access to Bayside is developed not using Outlot B, then Geffres involvement would be unnecessary and both Outlot A and B would revert back to the Olson property and be combined as part of Lot 1. Perhaps the only negative impact if this occurred would be that the Olson residence would likely expect to continue accessing directly to Bayside Road rather than being served by a future interior roadway. That would be an issue for discussion and a potential variance if the full multiple-lot plat was before you now (see 9/15/94 memo Exhibit F). One additional quirk: The agreement discusses replatting Outlot C into "buildable parcel§." and could be construed as not anticipating Outlot C being replatted as a single buildable lot. In the case of replatting Outlot C into a single buildable lot or requesting City approval for same, staff might argue that the addition of Outlot A and subtraction of a triangular road outlot from Geffre's property yield in effect a three lot plat which should be served by a private road onto which the Olson residence, the Geffre residence, and the new lot must access. Alternatively, it could be considered as merely a lot line rearrangement between Geffre and Olson, and the creation of a private driveway outlot to serve the large parcel to the rear. This interpretation would be left to Council.