My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
4645 Bayside Road - 06-117-23-22-0009
>
Land Use
>
94-1967, SUBD
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2025 3:16:05 PM
Creation date
11/20/2025 3:13:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Request for Council Action continued <br />page 2 of 5 <br />October 6, 1994 <br />Zoning File #1967 <br />Application Background <br />• Applicants had initially included the adjacent Irvin Geffre property at 4665 <br />Bayside in a proposed plat to create five new building sites. <br />• Applicants worked with staff regarding road layout and septic requirements for <br />that proposal and concluded that only four new lots would be possible. <br />• Concurrently, K-P Properties has been attempting to acquire the Fred and David <br />White acreage to the immediate west, but have been unsuccessful to-date, <br />although such a transaction is still being pursued. <br />• Rather than proceed with the four lot subdivision, just prior to the Planning <br />Commission meeting applicants revised the proposal to merely splitting off the <br />Olson residence and leaving the remaining Olson acreage for development later <br />this year or early next year. <br />• Applicants consulted with staff to accomplish such a subdivision that would not <br />leave the remaining acreage landlocked, and which would result in the existing <br />residence requiring no variances regardless of whether a future subdivision <br />occurs. <br />Planning Commission Denial Recommendation <br />Planning Commission reviewed the conceptual information provided by the applicant and staff's <br />concerns (see memo of 9/15/94). Given the lack of septic testing and only having conceptual <br />sketches rather than the formal survey work to review, Planning Commission offered applicant <br />tabling or denial. Applicant requested a denial in order to move this along to the Council since <br />Mr. Olson and the buyer of his house wish to close on the property as soon as possible. <br />Planning Commission suggested that applicant work with staff to prepare a subdivision plan for <br />presentation to Council. <br />Outlots Intended for Future Development <br />Staff advised applicants that splitting off the residence lot must not leave the remaining acreage <br />landlocked. Potential access to the remaining 14 acres is through Lot 1 or from Bayside through <br />White's property, which applicants don't control.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.