Laserfiche WebLink
front yard areas of the Pheasant Lawn neighbo.-hood along Pheasant <br />Road. The boat is stored less than 35 feet from the street in the <br />side/street yard. A boat less then 20 feet could be stored in the <br />location in conformance with the code. <br />If you review the staff exterior boat storage survey of the sur- <br />rounding area, note that only one other Pheasant Lawn resident stores <br />an oversized boat on their property (Area 1). The boat is stored 10 <br />to 15 feet off Pheasant F.oad screened by a small shrub. The remaining <br />residents of Pheasant Lawn store their boats off site. The boat <br />stored in Area 2 is located in the front/street side yard. The boat <br />stored in Area 7 is located in a lakeshore/front yard. My windshield <br />survey reveals a total of eight oversized boats stored in the Pheasant <br />Lawn, Shore Hills and Narrows area of the City. <br />This is the first variance application to the exterior storage <br />section of the code to be reviewed by the City. <br />Mr. Eller claims his rear yard cannot be considered because of <br />the topography. There is no feasible site on the property to store a <br />boat of this size in addition to meeting the screening requirements. <br />Eller claims he cannot move the boat and cradle at this time of year. <br />I have asked Jim Dunn of Chaska Marina to confirm El ler's claim. Dunn <br />is aware of the Eller boat because of the newspaper article and con- <br />firms that the boat could sustain severe damage to the hull because of <br />the age of the wooden cradle, age of boat, type of boat construction <br />and time of year. <br />At the two Planning Commission meetings reviewing their applica- <br />tion, the neighbors have been very vocal in opposing the boats' <br />storage location. They have found a nearby neighbor who has agreed to <br />allow storage of the Eller boat until the spring. Eller is grateful <br />but he claims that moving the boat at this time of year is <br />unthinkable. The neighbors fail to communicate directly with Eller - <br />once again, the City has stepped in as mediator. Eller confirms in <br />writing that he does not plan to store the boat on his property in the <br />future (see Exhibit G). <br />Staff offered the following approving recommendation to the <br />Planning Commission: <br />To allow a boat in excess of 20 feet to be temporarily stored at <br />its present location 10'+/- from side/west lot line and 20'+/- from <br />side/street lot line until April 15, 1985 and that in the event the <br />subject boat is not moved by the specified deadline date, a citation <br />will be issued to the owner. Applicant has agreed in writing to store <br />the subject boat off site in the future but in the event a future <br />owner wishes to store a boat in excess of 20' on the property that <br />he/she be forewarned that there may not be a suitable site on the <br />property for winter boat storage and to contact the Orono staff for <br />current setback standards and screeninq requirements. Approval of the <br />variance application is based on the following hardships and findings: <br />