Laserfiche WebLink
MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE CODIFIERS, INC. <br />!.11��l11T! IN cN.wTT M I,l v�lION •NU <br />OwO,N.NCI COO191C AT ON [.CI U41Y(I T <br />WON MINNEIOTA• OOYlwNYTNT.I UNIT! <br />Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />Box 66 <br />Crystal B"y, MN 55323 <br />Dear Jeanne: <br />,� to <br />k'ITY OF ORONO <br />7400 Tyndale Avenue South <br />Minneapolis. Minnesota 55423 <br />Area Code 61) <br />869-1403 <br />February 11, 1985 <br />We received from your office a copy of Ordinan--e No. 9, 2nd <br />Series, with a request that we prep• a the substitute pages for <br />printing and insertion in your Code. We always contact a city <br />approximately one year after the cffective date of a new Cod(--, <br />but this called our immediate attention to maintenance of the <br />Orono Code so I contacted City Attorney Tom Radio by phone who <br />suggested that I call you directly, which I did last Friday. In <br />our cor sation you said that mainter,anr of the Code was an <br />immedi, but unresolved problem for you. <br />You said that you had been considering requesting a price of us <br />for the purchase of our word processing discs. You are certainly <br />welcome to them for the current price of new discs, and no more. <br />However, even at that price, they will, in our opinion, be of <br />little value to you. While Code revision is frequently used by <br />equipment- salespersons as an inducement to buy, the mechanics of <br />printing replace ^;tt pages is the least expensive step in true <br />Code maintenar Our firm maintains many Codes for cities all <br />over the Stag_, we do not keep ac . ,e discs. Please permit us <br />to review some -ters of greater importance. <br />Our contract with the City provides for assistance with your <br />first amending ordinances so that they can be easily inserted in <br />the Code. We covered this with the persons present at the con- <br />ferences but, unfortunately, they are no longer with the City. <br />We share your concern for good maintenance. Without it the <br />original work deteriorates and ultimately requires recodifica- <br />tion. You have had one such experience which need not Le <br />repeated. Your Code has been in effect less tran one yezr and we <br />surely do not imply that it is in trouble already -- res_ assured <br />it is not. However, we suggest that now is the time to ,Ian your <br />maintenance program. Accordingly, we will review some options <br />open to you. <br />