Laserfiche WebLink
permits issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency which govern <br />resolution of the Twin Cities combined sewer overflow problem. <br />WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THE SEPARATION PROGRAM? <br />Separating the combined sewer pipes to end the practice of dumping raw <br />sewage in the Mississippi River will help ameliorate a public health threat <br />Posed by the fecal coliform and viruses that now enter the river via overflow <br />outlets. What groups of people will benefit? Everyone along and downstream of <br />the current outfalls: river users of all types, the three directly affected <br />cities, the public and states downstream from the Twin Cities. Minnesota as a <br />whole will benefit. Its 3reate3t river will be cleaner and more esthetic. <br />Solving the combined sewer overflow problem removes a threat of state or <br />federal sanctions or court -dictated answers that might be doubly expensive or <br />impact the natural suburban growth and development of the Twin Cities Area. <br />STEPS THAT NEED TO BE TAKEN <br />Combined sewer overflow in the Metropolitan Area and inadequate wastewater <br />treatment are two important water quality problems remaining in the state. <br />There has not been enough federal and state funding to solve thos problems on <br />ar. accelerated timetable. <br />1. The 1985 legislature needs to fund adequately the independent state <br />construction grants program that was established by the 1984 legislature. The <br />Program must include combined sewer overflow projects as grant -eligible. <br />2. The Coneresb needs to pass a new Clean Water Act that provides an <br />appropriate federal share of the cost of further water quality improvements. <br />These actions will, in turn, provide the necessary financing so the sewer <br />separation program can be carried out rapidly and outstate communities can get <br />on with improving their water quality. <br />3. Minneapolis, St. Paul, and South St. Paul need to complete their <br />planning for sewer separations, which is currently under way. <br />4. The Metropolitan Council needs to amend its Water Resources Management <br />Development Guide to include the separation projects. The changes are scheduled <br />for early 1985. The Council also needs to give an earlier -than -planned go ahead <br />to three regional sewer interceptor projects that are planned as part of the <br />sewer separation solution. Estimated cost of the regional interceptors is about <br />$20 mill -on. <br />draft Oct 12 <br />01222A POEDTI <br />