01-14-1985 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Juic 1, 1982 1 ike that within 1 , 200 feet , he has a lawful permit. tcd use - for instance, 1 icensed day care centers for up to 6 people are permitted even in Croixwood - the State law provides that they are that way - public policy i.i the legisl,rture has determined that the only way that they are going to get these objectionable residences within the commnity is to legislate and provide by the statutes that they are permitted - so there is the outside chance that he could be back in there with an emergency shelter if he abandons Myrtle Street - if on the other hand there are two within. 1,200 feet then that is a different story and he would have to have a Conditional Use Permit from the City Council. MR. OERIU L asked what the Stillwater Residence is classified as and MR. MAGNUSON stated that it is not a residential day care facility or it doesn't fall within the classification of homes as the statutes recognizes it - the Stillwater Residence is licensed by the I` >artment of Health and the Departrnent of Welfare is not concerned with it - it is a different kind of animal. MRS. OERTELL asked if ^ir. Anderson did mtirve the kids back toclive Street would he have to be a resident of that facility and MR MAGNUSON stated that he dilnot think so. MR. L01�1fR asked about the number that could put into that hone and COUNCIU.UMAN BODLOVICK stated that the G)uncil could put a limit on Olive Street because there were the two homes within 1,320 feet - and this was the only opportunity that they could do that on that piece of property at that time. If Dickie should close up Myrtle Street and moves back to Olive Street, she did not feel that the Council could set anv kind of restrictions other than the State. 111R. OEh"IL11, stated that should that happen that the Council owes it to them to try - when the Council gave him the Myrtle Street permit, he asked for it by saying that his Olive Street residence would never again become an anergency shelter and it also said sit: kids plus four of his wan. 111E MAYOR C1,OSED THE ITARING. COUNCIIIaOMAN BODI)VICK moved to follow the rec(nriendation of the Plannini� Cow.iission on denying this Special Use Permit for a bed and breakfast lodging - this is a conplete change from the existing neighborhood - it is iiuch nx)re comnercialized - the traffic would be that much more greater and this would be nx)re cannercial than in keeping with the present neighborhood than is fair and traffic congestion is primary in this area maw. (there was no second to this notion - notion died for a lack of a second) OWNCIIl1AN PETERSON moved the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit to Sherwood and Gloria Vegsund, 306 West Olive Street to operate a bed and breakfast institution kriawn as Rivertown Inn callirq, forth fain special conditions to be a part of this part permit - the first and forams r8t it be issued with .ne understanding that it issued in the riame of Sherwood and Gloria Vegsund and it is L der no way transferable to any other party than the Vegsunds. The second condition w,)uld be that this becane their full time residence and that it be homesteaded as such so that it can be an institution or an establishment in :mich they will be primarily the nKain residEnts. (lie continued to cite the conditions presented by Ah-. L•umners at the opening of the hearing) With those conditions he moved that the Gonclitional Use Permit be granted. Questions were asked about the member who stay there if they ;✓ plan to live there and Mrs. Vegsui& stated that there would })e 8 be&ooms available as they are making the library into a bedroom. ODiVCIIJA1,1LN AVISE seconded the motion. AYES--Gauncilwoman Avise, Cotncilnx•n MacDonald, and 1'eterson NAYS--Cotnrcilwcn►an &-dlovick ABSTAI?IF:D-14,yor Junker did txot indicate a vote (ta)tion carried)