Laserfiche WebLink
Other Waste Reduction Techniques <br />The other waste reductions techniques can be classified under the categories of <br />1) improvements to industrial or manufacturing processes, 2) improvements to <br />procurement policies, 3) paper reduction, and 4) legislative or regulatory <br />actions. Certain industries, especially heavy manufacturing, may be able to <br />realize cost savings if processes and raw materials are changed in favor of <br />alternatives producing less waste. Direct financial subsidies or tax incen- <br />tives may be necessary, however, to accelerate their development. Procurement <br />policies give greater consideration to the total costs over a product's life, <br />or "life -cycle costing", before purchase. This should result in preferences <br />for more durable, reusable and recyclable goods and should also result in a <br />preference for "purchasing more product and less container," such as buying in <br />bulk or buying in refillable bottles. Paper reduction includes information <br />storage and retrieval techniques that shrink office paper consumption such as <br />use of microfiche, use of magnetic media (for example, computer discs and <br />tapes) and paper conservation policies and procedures (for example, use of <br />carbonless forms, printing "back-to-back" on two sides rather than single -sided <br />copying). legislative or regulatory actions include activities such as product <br />bans and packaging rules. Both of these have been attempted in Minnesota as <br />waste reduction and environment-.l protection measures with very little <br />success. <br />No reduction levels or target dates are assigned to these ot�-r strategies <br />because the waste stream impact is unknown or the implementation is too specu- <br />lative to make specific projections. Notwithstanding, the Council and the <br />metropolitan counties should continue to evaluate these opportunities and if <br />further research warrants, this plan should be amended to include reduction <br />levels. <br />Proposed Roles and Rfsponsibilities <br />Programs should be established that focus on 1) enhancing the waste generator's <br />awareness of reduction opportunities, 2) facilitating the ability to take advan- <br />tage of the opportunities, and 3) developing implementation schemes that will <br />be economically advantageous to the recipients. <br />The cost savings of waste reduction activities will be the principal motivator <br />for change. A primary objective, therefore, should be to collect and dissemi- <br />nate this type of cost -benefit data. For instance, businesses and governments <br />that currently employ life -cycle costing in their procurement processes could <br />serve as models and resources for other waste generators of all types. Con- <br />sumer information should also be prepared to show how products sold in bulk and <br />in refillable containers are less costly and at the same time more environmen- <br />tally sound. To help consumers take advantage of the opportunities, technical <br />assistance programs should include model waste reduction management programs to <br />help residents, businesses and governments implement reduction strategies. <br />There are several levels of government that should be involved in waste reduc- <br />tion programs. Because each agency or level of government is also a waste <br />generator, each of them should be required to implement in-house waste reduc- <br />tion programs. Table 4-4 displays a list of potential roles and responsibili- <br />ties for the waste generator and various implementing agencies. <br />39 <br />