My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
12-10-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2025 2:40:19 PM
Creation date
11/3/2025 2:27:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MEETING <br />DEC 1 0 198i1 <br />TO: council CITY OF ORONO <br />FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoninq Administrator <br />DATE: December 6, 1984 <br />SUBJECT: #804 Painters Cheek, 4680 Bayside Road - Final <br />Subdivision <br />A) Road Name Request <br />The applicant has selected the following name!; for the plat road; they <br />are listed as to preference: <br />1st choice = Luce Line Ridge <br />2nd choice = Randolph Road <br />3rd choice = Line View Place <br />Staff founu no conflict with the three names selected in review of <br />existing roads in the immediate area and within Hennepin County. <br />Staff recommends the first choice of Luce Line Ridge. <br />B) Refund of Public Road Review Fee <br />You have received a memo from the Finance Department requesting a <br />transfer of $1,000 from the general fund (originally receipted by the <br />Building and Zoning Department for a public road review fee of $2, 100 - <br />see receipt enclosed) to the pare, fund. The applicant has chosen to <br />pay the $1,000 park fee directly and asks merely now that the City <br />refund $1,000 to applicant. <br />Staff has no problem with recommending the refund based -n the <br />following: <br />1. Staff never authorized staff or consultant time for the <br />public road review. <br />2. The applicant realized in the early stages of the sk-*ch <br />plan review that the City would not accept tine prof <br />rr.ads as public given the five -acre density and <br />'ineal footage of roads. <br />3. The applicant has asked only for a credit of $1,000 and <br />caul(' have asked for a refund of $1,285. <br />Public Road Fee = ;2,100 <br />Private Road Fee = $815 <br />C) Fi^al Subdivision Approval - Resolution <br />The .ipp1 cant has fulfilled all conditions of preliminary apprc _ ar.d <br />ha,, filed with the City all requested submittals required for final <br />s-abdivision application. Staff recommend approval of the plat, <br />eainters Creek, subject to the findings and conditions setforth i:, the <br />enclosed resolution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.