Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#723 - Ski Tonka, Inc. March 10, 1983 Page 2 I have not had a response from my letter of February 2, 1983 asking for clarification on the Highway Department's request for additional right of way for Bayside Road. Per Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdiv. 2, 3U days ha elapsed from the date of that letter without the required response, we will ask for a �3' dedication not a 401. The plat has been revised realigning the lot line between Lots 1 & 2 based on the inability to obtain adequate and suitable area for a primary and alternate site. Normally, with lots of five -plus acres, the City does not ask for septic testing. I asked that Lot 1 be tested based on the several slopes and wetlands areas that make up over half of the lot. Proposed Lot 1 now satisfies the septic standards of the City. If the alternate septic site is utilized at some .iture date, a new well site must be found and the old one abandoned. The City will ask for a flowage and conservation easement over the designated wetlands. The DNR has been contacted concerning the proposed plat but sta`f has heard nothing. A park for Lots 2 & 3 at $100 each must be t,aid. tannin,., .:ommission Recommendation - to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision application of Ski Tonka, Inc. at 4520 Bayside Road per the following condition;,: 1. Applicant execute a flowage and conservation easc:mc:nt over the designated wetlands area. 2. Access to lot shall be as approved by Henner,;n County Highway Depart- ment in their letter of January 27, 1983. 3. if Lot 1 is to use the alternate septic site at some r..ture date, the existing well must be abandoned and a new well site found on the property. 4. To recommend that the County maintaii. 66' : ight :-,f way width for CSAH 84 and that if the City Finds there is real need for the additional 7' because of proposed Lmprov•.-Mcnts along the urved area to -ecommend tent incil approve tht, V w4_dth. 5. Park &-dication fee of $200 (each und,2veloped lot P $100) 6. Setbacks for all accessory struct res meet 0,e required setbacks. Applicant is advi,�ed that theSO scr l.ictures may ,;ot be ._sed fo: ire keeping of anima'. s as they du not. me?et r,�quired 150' seti.3ck from newly creatd lot lines.