Laserfiche WebLink
2. The successful proposer shall provide evidence of coverage prior to <br />the effective date and deliver final policies either before said <br />date or within a reasonable time thereafter. <br />3. The successful proposer shall furnish a division or breakdown of <br />premium as may be required by the City and shall render a detailed <br />report of all losses or reserves at least annuUlly. <br />4. One factor which may have an important bearing on true cost is the <br />existence or absence n" gaps or overlaps between coverages provided <br />by different_ insurers. For that reason, favorable consideration <br />will be given by the City to proposals submitted through one insurer. <br />If a proposal is submitted through more than one insurer, all <br />insurers shall attach to their policic:-, an "Overlap Endorsement" <br />(sec' exhibit Al or other legally valid written evidence to the same <br />effect. The Overlap Endorsement provides that the event of an <br />insured lobs over which there is a valid dispute as to which insurer <br />is liable, each insurer agrees that if ultimately held liable for the <br />loss, it will reimburse the City for all expenses necessarily <br />incurred by the City to determine which insurer is liable. <br />Reimbursement shall be made only if liability is actually <br />established or compromi--d and then, if shared by more than one <br />insurer, in the proport' that loss payment is made. Example of <br />the need for this ment arise in attempting to fix <br />responsibility in areal ich include the following: <br />Explosion Losses - All Risk Property Cuverage v. Boiler ;Machinery; <br />Crime Losses - Theft or Mysterious Disappearance v. Fidelity; <br />Loading and Unloading Losses - General Liability v. Automobile <br />Liability; <br />Workmen's Compensation v. General and Automobile i.iability; <br />ights and Obligations of the City <br />Acceptance cr Rejection <br />Tije City has as its objective the transfer of certain insurable risks to <br />provide maximum protection at the lowest cost to extent that cost is <br />determinable in advance. Realizing that when all fact,,rs are <br />considered, lowest net premium and lowest true cost may or ma; be the <br />same, the City reserves the prerogative of deciding which over.,: i plan or <br />combinatic of plans, will in its opinion most economically meet its <br />needs. <br />1. Workmen's Compensation may or may not be included as bidder chooses, <br />but in any event Workmen's Compensation quotation must be separate <br />and divisable. <br />2. The specifications set forth are what the City considers to be <br />minimum coverage as to forms and a )unts. Alternate bids must <br />clearly show the advantages to the City for acceptance of such <br />alternate bid. A detailed explanation of broader or more limited <br />features of the alternate bid must be attached. Alternate bids <br />without such explanation will not be considered. <br />