10-15-1984 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

parked off White Oak Circle and on the construction site property. 3. Stress upon White Oak Circle drive due to heavy construction equipment traffic. a. The homeowners li, Qd/signing below have assumed responsibility for mp :fining and repairing White Oak Circle ever, though the drive is owned by the original developer, C.E. Van Eeckhout. We have, in fact, spent $6,400 to dale, in repair and maintenance of the drive. We have also contracted each winter for snow removal. Therefore, we consider White Oak Circle "our drive" even though it is owned by the original developer. b. There is an Fasement Purchase Agreement between the developers, George C. Funk and Judith A. Rogosheske, and C.E. Van Eeckhout, owner of Track I - White Oak Circle. The purchase price is $6,000 for an access and utilities easement. We have experienced damage to the drive in the past by heavy construction machinery being hauled over it. That damage prompted the repair and maintenance cited above. We request that the commission request the subdivision owners to provide a "construction road" on the south side of their property, allowing heavy equipment to pars in and out directly from Old Crystal Bay Road without using the White Oak Circle drive. In the event this is not done, we request that the commission require the $6,000 purchase price of the easement be set aside in escrow to repair whatever damage may result from contractors' use of the street. We also request, in the event heavy construction equipment traverses White Oak Circle drive, that the normal and usual Orono city restrictions as to load limits on city streets in the spring and fall also apply to White Oak Circle. 4. Possible Extention of White Oak Circle The present White Oak Circle ends in a cul-de-sac. There is currently a 60 foot road easement which is an extention of White Oak Circle between Plat 4 and Plat H. In the event that this easement is to be used as an access road to any of the developed property, we request, than it be constructed to the same road standards as White Oak Circle and not to ordinary "driveway" standards. The topography of the land, the existing road layout and the present homesites' locations, are such that a simple "driveway" would detract from the beauty and character of our neighborhood. We therefore ask that the present road standards be maintained if White Oak Circle is to be extended past, its present end at the cul-de-sac.