Laserfiche WebLink
significant barrier to institution and prosecution of a <br />suit for damages." [Citation omitted.] <br />Kerr v. Quinn, 692 F.2d 875, 878 (2nd Cir. 1982) (emphasis <br />added). The Second Circuit ultimately concluded that a denial of <br />attorney's fees to a plaintiff who sought only equitable relief <br />would deter similarly situated plaintiffs from enforcing their <br />constitutional rights. Id. at 878-79. That reasoning applies <br />fully to the case at bar. Mr. Welsh did not seek monetary <br />damages, but instead sought and obtained declaratory and <br />injunctive relief which establishes the far-reaching principle <br />that the Department of Natural Resources has exclusive <br />jurisdiction over work in the beds of public waters throughout <br />the State of Minnesota. With no promise of money damages or a <br />recoupment of their reasonable attorney's fees, Mr. welsh and <br />others similarly situated would face an undue economic bur, -:en in <br />seeking to entorce their civil rights. 51988 safeguards against <br />such a result. In short, the nature of the relief sought by Mr. <br />Welsh is a major reason for this Court to reject the Boland <br />result and to recognize Mr. Welsh's entitlement to fees under <br />S1988. <br />Finally, this Court cites Green v. Carbaugh, 460 F. Supp. <br />1193 (E.D.Va. 1978), and Naprstek v. City of Norwich, 433 <br />F. Supp. 1369 (N.D.N.Y. 1977), in support of its conclusion that <br />the instant action is not within the spirit of S1988 fee awards. <br />However, fees were denied in those cases not because of the <br />private nature of the actions, but due to tt,e courts' displeasure <br />with plaintiffs and their respective counsel. <br />-8- <br />