My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
10-15-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2025 9:58:20 AM
Creation date
10/30/2025 9:48:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CDUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 1984 PAGE 4 <br />CRYSTAL BAY AREA SANITARY <br />SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 3. SO percent of the total cost assessed against the <br />benefitting property owners would result in a. <br />total assessment of $6,705. <br />One man asked why the Art Center was excluded from the <br />sewer project. <br />Mayor Butler stated that the Art Center was excluded <br />from the sewer project because they have enough space <br />to expand their septic system if needed. Butler noted <br />that the Art Center is outside the MUSA boundary and to <br />redraw that line the City would have to have approval <br />from the Metropolitan Council. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that <br />staff would have to research the exact location of that <br />MUSA line. <br />LaDean McWilliam asked that the Council continue to <br />seek funding for the project. <br />City Engineer Cook noted the time frame of the sewer <br />construction. Cook stated that approximately 1 <br />month of preparation, a 60 day actual digging period of <br />heavy construction, and 1 month to clean up. <br />Gary Printup stated that the public's main concern is <br />the cost of the project. Frintup stated that they <br />would like to see the Council choose option 3. <br />Printup stated that it would not be precedent setting <br />to assess the cost of sewer like option 3 because <br />there are only two areas that need sewer in Orono and <br />that is Crystal Bay and Stubbs Bay. <br />Councilmember Frahm stated that if the City chooses <br />option 3 and the City has to pay for 50 percent of the <br />sewer project, that 50 percent would roll over onto the <br />general public. Frahm state(? that the general public <br />in turn would ask why their taxes are going up because <br />of the Crystal Bay sewer project when other projects in <br />the City had to pay for 100 percent of a project. <br />Frahm stated that assessing the cost of a project with <br />option 3 would be precedence setting. Frahm stated <br />that he would have to see the appraisals of the <br />properties before he could decide which option to take <br />as far as the assessments. <br />Councilmember Grabek stated that the Council has to <br />have some rationale to explain to the general tax <br />payers when they ask why the'. r taxes went up because of <br />sewer that is benefitting the Crystal. Bay area when <br />they don't even live in the area. Gr.abek stated that <br />he cannot. decide which option to choose unti 1 he gets <br />more information from staff in regard to how much the <br />general tax payers taxes will go up if the Council <br />chooses an 80:20 ratio or 70:30 ratio or 50:50. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.