Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 1984 PAGE 3 <br />CRYSTAL BAY AREA SANITARY <br />SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECTArlin Jansen stated that she did not receive a public <br />hearing notice. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaf f ron noted that Ms. <br />Jansen is outside the proposed Crystal Bay project <br />area and was not included on the list. <br />Rich Kiemen of 1212 Briar Street stated that he did not <br />receive a notice either. <br />Mayor Butler noted that Mr. Kiemen is on the mailing <br />D-st for the public hearing notice. Butler noted that <br />Lukanen and Kiemen should have received a notice <br />because they were mailed by the City. Butler also <br />noted that the public hearing was published in the <br />paper. <br />City Attorney Radio stated that the public hearing <br />could still be held. <br />City Engineer Cook reviewed with the audience where <br />the sewer lines would run on the streets. Cook stated <br />that the septic tanks are failing on many of the <br />properties in the Crystal Bay area and that the area is <br />in need of sewer. Cook stated that the estimate for <br />the installation of sewer is based on 1985 dollars. <br />Cook stated that for the installation of sanitary <br />sewer it would cost $645,400 and for the street <br />restoration another $467,500. Cook stated that the <br />total for the whole project is $1,112,900. Cook <br />stated there would be an annual cost of $4,500 to <br />maintain the lift station. Cook stated that there are <br />83 units that would be assessed for sewer and the cost <br />per unit would be $13,410. Cook stated that an <br />additional $1,500 per unit for the connection to the <br />line w,,s anticipated. <br />Councilmember Adams arrived at 8:55 p.m. <br />City Engineer Cook stated that the Cou,icil has the <br />option of how the sewer project can be assessed. Cook <br />stated that a breakdown of the assessments on an annual <br />basis has been provided. Cook stated that probably a <br />15 year assessment at 11 percent interest would be <br />used. Cook stated that staff looked at three <br />different options for the assessment as follows: <br />1. The entire assessment based on 100 percent <br />assessed against the benefitting property owners <br />would result in a $13,410 per unit with a first <br />year charge of $2,692.41 on down to the year 2000 <br />where assessment would be $992.34. <br />2. 75 percent of the total cost assessed against the <br />ben fitting property owners would result in a <br />total assessment of $10,060 our unit and a $2,000 <br />assessment for the first year and on down to <br />