My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#2412 Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
4355 Bayside Road - 06-117-23-13-0005
>
4355 Bayside Rd - PID: 06-117-23-12-0007 - Old PID
>
Land Use
>
98-2412, SUBD
>
#2412 Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2025 12:55:04 PM
Creation date
10/23/2025 12:53:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: September 25, 1998 <br />ITEM NO.: 7 <br />Department Approval: Iv. -~ <br />Name Michael P. Gaffron / '{W- <br />Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Title Senior Planning Coordinator <br />Item Description: #2412 Steve White, 4355 Bayside Road -Class I Subdivision (Renewal) - <br />Resolution <br />Zoning District: RR-IA, 5 acre rural residential (north of Bayside Road) <br />Summary of Request <br />RR-lB, 2 acre rural residential (south of Bayside Road, north of quarter <br />section line) <br />LR-1 A, 2 acre lakeshore residential ( south of quarter section line) <br />This is a renewal of applicant's 1997 approval to split this 5 5 acre property into two parcels to create <br />one additional building site. Parcel A, the new building site, is proposed at 28.3 acres in total area <br />of which 21.1 acres is dry buildable. Parcel B, with the existing house, will be 26.8 acres in area of <br />which 21.1 acres is dry buildable. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A -Resolutiori <br />B -Memo and Exhibits of 9/17 /98 <br />Discussion <br />This subdivision was proposed by applicant in order to allow construction of a new residence on the <br />westerly half of the property. The original Council approval was granted in October 1997 and <br />expired in April 1998. The approval expired prior to filing of the subdivision because the applicant <br />was hesitant to provide the required Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetland adjacent <br />to North Arm bay. His issue was (is) that the standard Easement language would preclude him from <br />even applying for a permit to construct a dock to get to Lake Minnetonka, which his property abuts. <br />Staff has reviewed our standard easement language ( see Exhibit G of September 17 memo) with the <br />City Attorney and we have concluded that applicant's requested changes would change the scope of <br />the easement, which requires Council approval. Applicant's attorney had originally suggested two <br />changes, neither of which were acceptable to staff. The first would have added a condition G as <br />follows:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.