My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-24-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
09-24-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2025 2:35:34 PM
Creation date
10/20/2025 2:28:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
additional building sites, or whenever any property is developed or <br />redeveloped to a greater use density than the number of units <br />originally assessed, additional "unit" assessments shall be paid in <br />cash at the time of subdivision approval, or at the time of issuance of a <br />building permit, whichever occurs first. <br />III. PROJECT TYPES <br />21. Systems Replacements In -Rind. When an existing system requires <br />replacement in -kind without increase in capacity the replacement cost <br />may be: <br />a) Added to operating expense and paid by an increased rate or <br />surcharge to existing users (such as on sewer or water bi I lings) ; <br />or <br />b) Specially assessed to existing users on the same basis as new <br />construction would be assessed. <br />22. System Replacements For Increased Capacity. When an exis'_in(I <br />system must be enlarjed to accommodaty increased use or capacity the <br />replacement cost should be divided as follows: <br />a) The total replacement cost should be as-,-sed against new <br />development when the replacement is required solely to permit <br />such new future development. <br />b) Vie oversizing cost should be assessed against new development <br />and the cost of replacement in -kind may be as 2ssed against the <br />existing users when an otherwise requirement replacement is <br />oversized to accommodate future development. <br />23. Improvements Within New Developments. All on -site and off -site <br />improvements necessary to accommodate private land development will <br />normally be installed and financed privately by the developer and not <br />by the City as a public project. Exceptions to this policy would allow <br />public improvement and special assessment only as follows: <br />a) Only upon petition by the developer. <br />b) Only if the Council finds a general public benefit to be gained by <br />constructing the project as a public improvement, such as: <br />1) Improvements that benefit other than developer's property. <br />2) Improvements would have had to be installed as a public project <br />even if the development was not occurring. <br />3) Improvements are an extension or continuation of an adjoining <br />public project. <br />4) Improvements within the development must be oversized or <br />otherwise changed to s_rve property outside the development, <br />page 10 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.