Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.279 <br />MOOIMDIKI LAYt La[l Y✓Ll eLAiM YL DIea YiYMLT(mlex aIACM • Ost W 0 <br />FACT SHEET <br />ORDWO SCHOOL DISTRICT LEVY REFERENDUM <br />Vhv is a referendum needed At this time? <br />There are several adverse factors which continue to impact heavily on your school <br />district's financial sit us tion: <br />- Even though valuations have increased considerably on many hotel in the district, <br />under the State Foundation Aid formula this does tot provide additional school <br />revenue. (When property tames rise bees use of increases in adjusted valuation <br />figures used by the state, the state automatically decreases its coo tribution to <br />local schools, so school revenues do not rise.) <br />- As enrollment continues to decline, aids and levies are tedured proportionately <br />by the State, Mich represents hundreds of thousands in aarulAtive aid loss. but <br />many school torts are ralatively fixed And manor be reduced proportioastely. <br />- In the early 60's the State fared a recession And cot aids to school districts. <br />During 1982-83 ou; budget was set, contrscts negotiated, And commitments made on <br />a budget based on $1416 aid per pupil unit. We actually received $1316 per unit <br />resulting in a loss to our district of $252,200. <br />- During 1982-83, the lsgtslsture shifted $1.2 million of Orton's 1983-84 property <br />tames to the 1982-83 year, and reduced Our state Aid by that amount. This huge <br />cash loss not only wiped Out Met of the district's investment income but forre.d <br />us into short-term borrowing to meet snnval operating arysnses. <br />- to M "4 the aid form,, is we, set at $1473 per pupil we It And frozen at that <br />some figure for the 1984-85 scbool year. <br />- for IISS-86 the range of pupil omit increase grouted by the 1 Sslatute among <br />29 metro districts was from 5.12 to 12.0I. Orono's 19 At 5.92, along the five <br />lowest. With a projected decl lne of 67 pupil units in that vale (12), the Oct <br />reven.w Lcrasse will be about 3I. <br />- The previous referendum in 1982 provided partial relief, but the board stated <br />at that time that "additional funds from this referendum are a temporary solution <br />for long-range funding prohlva." alms called for A �scmd referendum in <br />2-3 years. <br />- Additional funds, if approved nw, will be realized beglanIng with the 1465-86 <br />school year And will offset most of a projected deficit through 198r 7. 3t <br />What has already been done by your board' <br />The district has continued to reduce administration, teachers, support staff, suprl-es. <br />ead textbooks as enrollment declined. Lnergv-ssvini me&&area have ben initiated. <br />Without the 1932 referenduum and the following economy maasures taken, the district's <br />deficit would now be at 61,135,000. <br />- Kept* Plain Elements" was closed in 1982 saving the district S130,000 snnua'1%. <br />plus $30,000 to ads Sciattativ costs, A lessee fa being sought to provide <br />additional revenue. <br />