My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
09-10-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2025 12:49:26 PM
Creation date
10/20/2025 12:39:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO: City Council <br />FROM: Dick Benson, City Administrator <br />DATE: April 19, 1984 <br />SUBJECT: Paul. Smith - 2477 Dunwoody Avenue - Progress Report <br />On January 23, 1984, the City Council approved the installation of a <br />holding tank at the Paul Smith residence at 2477 Dunwoody Avenue as <br />an: option to connecting, to sanitary sewer. <br />I: City Council also encouraged Smith to continue to negotiate an <br />easement with Powers so that a connection to sanitary sewer could be <br />accomplished. <br />On March 26, 1984, Mike Gaffron and I met with Paul Smith. Smith <br />indicated that he had talked to the Powerses and that they seemed agree- <br />able to an easement to Smith. <br />On April 4, 1984, Smith stated to us that he could not negotiate an <br />easement with Powers and was now sure that he would have a holding tank <br />installed. <br />During the week of April 9, 1984, Smith asked City staff if he could <br />p ut in a private well. We advised Smith that we would discuss the matter <br />at staff level because of the fact that municipal water is available. <br />After discussing the matter at staff level, it is our opinion that a <br />private well should not be allowed as there is a water connection for <br />Smith. <br />We also searched the assessment policy and have determined that Smith's <br />property was assessed for 50' of frontage at a cost of $290 for water <br />and charged one unit at a cost of $580 for Smith is not aware of <br />staff's decision on the private well matter. <br />This situation (water service) is not comparaYle to his sewer service <br />assessment since Mr. Smith's sewer charge was not fo- a service, only <br />$9.90 for an area charge. <br />We should discuss the legal implications Monday evening. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.