My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3775 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-24-0111
>
Land Use
>
04-3017, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2025 10:16:23 AM
Creation date
10/16/2025 10:15:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.- <br />. MINUTES OF THE _ <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEb nNG <br />MONDAY, MAY 17, 2004 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(14. #04-3016 HENRY LAZNIARZ, Continued) <br />Leslie asked if the Parks Commission recommendation on access to the Luce Line Trail would actually affect <br />the site lot layout. <br />Bremer did not support that a point access to the Luce Line Trail be approved with the PRD and therefore it <br />was not necessary to go through the process of Parks Commission review. · <br />Rahn commented that the access issue is not something needed to be determined but left to the individual lot <br />owner to determine. Chair Mabusth responded that it is a matter of access control is an individual lot owner <br />creates an informal path to the Luce Line Trail. It was pointed out there are only three lots abutting the Luce <br />Line Trail. It was a consensus to not stipulate any point access. <br />Bremer moved, Rahn seconded, to recommend approval of Application #04-3016 for Preliminary Plat - <br />Planned Residential Development (PRD), Henry Lazniarz/Wayzata Design and Development, 120 <br />Brown Road South for a proposed 7-lot residential plat of property abutting the Luce Line Trail and <br />Long Lake Creek, subject to the following stipulations: <br />a. Approving the site layout and lot standards, lot configuration and setbacks <br />b. Requiring a conservation easement to match the utility/drainage easement as shown <br />c. Requiring no joint access point to the Luce Line Trail <br />d. Resolving the legal issues resulting from the private road and assuring real access to the <br />property, including utilization of the lO'public easement <br />e. Requiring a Phase I archaeological survey be completed prior to Final Plat Approval <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 2. <br />Chair Mabusth expressed her opinion that she agreed with all issues except for the format of the PRD. She <br />supported designation of an open space outlot with credit for the area based on the outlot area and all of the <br />dry buildable area instead of individual lots. <br />Kempf stated he agreed with the entire proposal except that if it were an outlot with neighborhood <br />responsibility for the area he expected the neighborhood would evolve differently from individually owned <br />lots. <br />15. #04-3017 SPRUCE IIlLL PROPERTIES, INC., 3775 BAYSIDE ROAD, VARIANCES, PUBLIC <br />HEARING (11:42-11:50 p.m.) <br />Dave Thorp, Spruce Hill Properties, Inc., applicant, was present. <br />Curtis explained the application requesting hardcover, lake setback and rear yard (street) setback variances in <br />order to do an extensive remodel, which consists of renovating the first floor and re-constructing the ½ story <br />above. She recommended approval of the application and plans as submitted due to the hardships inherent to <br />the configuration of the property, in particular, the shallow lot depth and size and location of the existing home <br />on the lot. <br />Matt Cookson, Spruce Hill Properties, agreed that the shallow nature of the property makes limited buildable <br />area, as the lake yard setback and front yard setback overlap. He stated the house now sits on the most <br />conforming location on the lot meeting the 30'side yard setback. The proposed remodel is on the existing <br />foundation and slightly reduces the amount of existing hardcover. Further, he suggested they could reduce the <br />cement patio to the setback of the deck, reducing it about 6' back. <br />Dave Thorp, Spruce Hill Properties, commented that the deck is essential to the property. <br />Page 38 of 40
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.