My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3775 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-24-0111
>
Land Use
>
05-3142, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2025 10:04:14 AM
Creation date
10/16/2025 10:02:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hardcover Variance (0-75' & 75'-250' zones) <br />#05-3142 <br />October 17, 2005 <br />Page 4 of5 <br />The property has two hardcover zones; the 0-75' zone and 75'-250' zone. 1,131 square <br />feet of hardcover currently exists in the 0-75' zone where 0 s.f. is normally allowed. <br />Also, 2,298 s.f. (or 20%) hardcover exists in the 75'-250' zone where 25% is normally <br />allowed. However, in order for the entire property to be within allotted hardcover <br />allowances the 0-75' hardcover gets transferred back to the 75'-250' zone (or 0-250') <br />bringing the hardcover in the 75' -250' zone to 3,429 s.f. or 30%, which was approved in <br />the June 2004 variances. The applicants have proposed to remove 147.5 s.f. of non- <br />structural hardcover in order to be permitted a shed. This would yield a net decrease in <br />hardcover of approximately 3 .5 s.f. The removals consist of a smaller front sidewalk and <br />elimination of the driveway strip along the side of the garage. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br />additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br />traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of <br />property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual <br />property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such <br />actions will be in keep inf! with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoninf! Code. <br />Staff finds that the property is unique due to the overlapping street and lake setback <br />requirements with the additional wetland restrictions. Those hardships are documented in <br />Resolution 5198 approved in 2004. The proposal meets the intent of the code, being that <br />no increase in hardcover is proposed, the shed is not located closer to the street than the <br />existing house, the lake setback is met, as well as wetland and side yard setbacks. <br />However, a remaining issue is the City policy that non-structural hardcover should not be <br />traded for structural hardcover. This policy has been enforced in a manner consistent <br />with the intent and provisions of Resolution No. 4006 (attached as Exhibit F) and <br />depending on the reasonableness of the request and the various constraints of the <br />property, has on occasion been waived through the variance process. The Planning <br />Commission should determine whether a trade of non-structural hardcover should be <br />permitted for construction of the proposed shed. <br />Wetland Impacts <br />While this application was made prior to adoption of the current wetland ordinance and <br />would not be subject to the new wetland ordinance restrictions, the proposed location of <br />the shed meets the 50' buffer and 20' setback from the buffer from the delineated edge of <br />the "preserve" wetland. Installation of a buffer would not be required as the thresholds <br />noted in Section 78-1601 (c)(4)(a-c) are not met. Technically, the applicant is only <br />required to meet a 26' setback.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.