Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO:Mrv:IISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 20, 1995 (#5 -#2088 Winfield Stephens -Continued) Mabusth asked for Planning Commission's view if the vacation was not part of the application. Lindquist said he ~as of the position that the garage should come down if it is not located in the legal building envelope. He noted that it was to the benefit of the applicant to proceed with the vacation of the alley. Gardiner said he had offered a neighbor $2,000 to consider the vacation but had received no reply. Gardiner asked if the Commission would consider option #1. Berg asked where the garage would go. Stephens asked if the vacation of the alley could not be done, if the process could proceed. Peterson said the garage would still need to be addressed. Gardiner remarked that he had purchased the property in 1982, and the garage was built before that time. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2088. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Peterson suggested the applicants put the burden on the neighbor to determine the driveway easement. (#6) #1958 LOUIS OBERHAUSER, 2405 DUNWOODY A VENUE, 3865 AND 3877 SHORELINE DR..T\7E-PRELWJNARY SlJBDIVISION -9:35-10:02 P.lVI. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. The applicant was represented by Jack Neveaux. Mabusth said the application was for a lot line rearrangement and replat of two lots. The original subdivision application was filed in 1994 had also included applicant's homestead parcel. The current application includes 3 substandard lots. The property is in the 1/2 acre zoning district. Lot 1 to the west contains 16,500 s.f, and Lot 2 to the east contains 20,000 s.f Existing now, according to Mabusth are two boarded up structures, one structure had been removed, and one rental unit structure. Mabusth reported that the applicant seeks approval of lakeshore setback variances for lot 1 involving a 6' encroachment oflakeshore setback line. The structure will be located l O' from street lot line and existing detached garage is 6' into the right-of-way. Both structures would meet the 1 O' side setback. A timber retaining wall is located in lot 2, and the applicant is willing to remove the wall if able to gain the variances for lot 1. There are no lakeshore decks proposed with new construction plans. '14