My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3770 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-24-0121
>
Land Use
>
95-2088, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2025 9:27:16 AM
Creation date
10/16/2025 9:25:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO:MMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 20, 1995 <br />(#5 -#2088 Winfield Stephens -Continued) <br />Christine Valerius reported that she owns the property they were referring to and noted <br />that the Wicklands use the driveway but that there was no easement in favor of this <br />property. She said she looked when she purchased the property and found no easement. <br />Stephens reported on the attorneys who had searched the title and showed Valerius a copy <br />of the easement. <br />Peterson said there were other concerns with the garage encroachment and clean up of <br />area to the west. Gardiner said a boat had been there and rubbish -left by previous owner <br />of Landmark property. <br />Lindquist asked if any improvements involved the tearing down of the garage located on <br />the alleyway. Stephens said he had no plans to do so. Lindquist said he could not <br />approve any improvements with the garage in that location if the vacation was not <br />approved. <br />Berg said it was important to make sure the easement exists. She added that she did not <br />feel the Commission could proceed to approve any improvement without the alley <br />vacation. Peterson agreed that this would be an integral part of the application. <br />Peterson said he favored option #1 and the vacation and asked if the survey (1988) <br />commented on the alley. Mabusth said there has been no new construction to require a <br />new survey. <br />Lindquist said the variance should be based on whether or not the vacation is granted. He <br />was not in favor of any further encroachment of the west side yard. <br />Smith commented that the addition was very aggressive and could not take a position <br />without a decision on the alleyway. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Gardiner remarked that the connection charge to City sewer was $13,000 and would be a <br />very expensive sewer for a 1 bedroom house. Gardiner said that is why it should be <br />expanded and noted that the neighbors had expanded. The Wickslands commented that <br />their lot was 1-1/2 acres, and they had to sacrifice a large tree in order to meet building <br />setbacks. <br />Stephens was asked ifhe planned on living in the house and was told he did. <br />13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.