My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
12-12-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2025 1:24:02 PM
Creation date
10/13/2025 1:05:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
643
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: Octobe: 20, 1.988 <br />Subject: #1346 Einar Hagberg, 740 North Arm Drive - <br />Variance - Resolution <br />Application - Hardcover variance to construct a detached storage garage. <br />Zoning District - LR-lB <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Staff Drawing on Survey Indicating Sewer Line Location & <br />Proposed Garage Location Revision <br />Exhibit B - Planning Commission Nction Notice of 10/20/88 <br />Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibit of 10/13/88 <br />Discussion - <br />Please review the memo and exhibits of October 13, 1988. The <br />applicant proposes to construct a detached storage garage of 576 s.f. floor <br />area near the northwest corner of his property. <br />Hardcover in the 0-75' zone is 2,070 s.f. or 18.6% with no charge <br />proposed. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 7,148 s.f. or 32.9% which would <br />be increased by 480 s.f. or up to 35.6%. In the 250-500' zone existing <br />hardcover is 900 s.f. or 30% and will increase to 996 s.f. or 33.2%. <br />In reviewing this, Planning Commission felt that the gravel driveway <br />above the municipal sewer line, which provides access should the City need <br />to maintain that line, is not a fully gravelled surface and is not driven <br />on extensively, but serves a public purpose, so that it should be excluded <br />from both sides of the hardcover calculation. While this may be an unusual <br />approach, making those calculations results in 0-75' hardcover of 11.58 and <br />75-250' hardcover of 29.5%, before the new garage is included. Planning <br />(-cmmission did not feel that it was necessary to remove any existing <br />hardcover on the property to accommodate this hardcover increase. <br />the Planning Commission, at their October 17th meeting, recommended on <br />a 5-0 vote to approve the subject garage addition without any hardcover <br />removals. <br />Sewer Location Issue - <br />Since the Planning Commission review, staff has discovered that an <br />additional sewer line exists along the north line of the property near the <br />storage garage. This line apparently serves no houses, but is used as a <br />system flushing paint. Because that pipe is only 5' from the proposed <br />garage, and the standard easement for sewer purposes would be 10' either <br />side of the pipe, it is appropriate to require that them property owner <br />.relocate that proposed garage to be at least. 10' from the sewer line. This <br />should cause no apparent problems for the property owner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.