Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1337 <br />September 29, 1988 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Exhibit G notes the location of curb lines for Crystal Place and <br />Navarre Avenue and the triangular space that is allowed no <br />obstructions. It appears that the proposed garage would not not cause <br />a visibility problem For this intersection. <br />6. City records do not indicate whether the sewer connection was made on <br />the sewer stub on Lot 9 at Crystal Place or on Lot 10 at Crystal <br />Place. Applicant should verify that the sewer connection used the <br />easterly stub, since if the westerly stub was used, the garage would <br />appear to be over that private sewer line, making future repairs <br />problematic. <br />Discussion - <br />Given the tenor of contemporary zoning codes for the LR-lC district, <br />approval of a garage in the proposed location would be quite unusual, <br />unless this was a lakeshore lot, in which case it would be quite normal. <br />In a case such as this, Planning Commission must carefully weigh the <br />hardships noted by the applicant against the potential visual effect such a <br />structure will have on the character of the surrounding neighborhood. It <br />would be unusual for, the Planning Commission to consider the "extremely <br />high costs of site grading" as a legitimate hardship, although applicant <br />certainly may feel that the grading and potential need to remove existing <br />amenities is not reasonable. <br />Also, Planning Commission must consider whether placement of a garage <br />in the proposed location would decrease the light, air, and open space in <br />the neighborhood. Certainly what now appears to be a large park -like lawn <br />area will be visually affected by a garage structure. <br />It is not clear to staff whether applicant definitely proposes to <br />remove the existing garage if the proposed garage is constructed. If that <br />garage is removed, does that help justify the new proposed garage location? <br />Finally, please consider whether the statements of hardship shown by <br />the applicant are hardships created by the property owner rather than <br />hardships inherent with the property. Consider whether a new gara(-e <br />located say 5' from the south lot line in place of the existing garage, <br />would be more appropriate. <br />