12-12-1988 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C) The property was proposed at 1-acre residential inits as sewer and water was planned for the area. D) The property would be served by either a cul-de-sac or loop (circular) road with no connection to the west if a frontage road is to be installed within commercial corridor. E) Maximum allowed density would be subject to availability of municipal services, buffering to rural residential, etc. 2. On October 10, 1988, the Council adopted Resolution #2525 approving the rezoning of the property from RR-lB to R-lA based on the following findings: A) The Comprehensive Plan Amendment included this property within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) Cistrict approving the extension of sewer service to the area. The amendment also provided another alternative to the residential development of the property other than the existing rural residential 2 acre minimum iot size. B) The property is immediately adjacent to a commercial corridor along Highway 12 and the proposed 1 acre zoning would provide an excellent buffer or transition to the surrounding rural residential development. C) The current code requires rezoning to R-lA in order to allow the 1 acre densities recommended in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. D) The rezoning will allow single family residential development. The R-lA zoning district will allow only detached single family residential development. E) In a preliminary resort, the City Engineer confirmed that sanitary sewer can be provided to the property. Sewer will be provided either through Long Lake by the Joint Powers Agreement or by constructing a new interceptor within the Highway 12 Corridor. The expense of which is to be borne by the property owner. F) The j.x,t:osel division satisfies all of the special minimum requiremei,ts for rezoning under the proposed zoning ordinance amendment of the Highway 12 Corridor currently under consideration by the Coincil. Page 2 of 11