Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MAY 18, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1734 -CONT. <br />Mabusth explained that was when a two lot split was proposed of the <br />southern or homestead portion of the property which would have <br />required credit of the wetland areas. <br />It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Johnson, to recommend <br />approval for Application #1734 for John Burger for property at 3750 <br />Bayside Road, for a two lot subdivision, subject to the conditions <br />set forth by staff_ in the memo to Planning Commission dated May 13, <br />1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />Mabus th noted that the on-site septic <br />recommendations to the future developers <br />should be incorporated with the approval. <br />those conditions being incorporated. <br />(#3) #1679 WILLIAM MILLER, <br />2691 CASCO POINT ROAD - <br />inspector had specific <br />of the property which <br />The Members agreed to <br />VARIANCE -CONTINUATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING 7:10 -7:15 P.M. <br />W i I I i am M i I I e r was present . <br />Mabusth explained that at the last meeting at which the applicant <br />appeared, the orig i na I proposa I was divided into two parts. The <br />first issue was the gazebo, which Planning Commission recommended <br />approval of but Counci I tabled unti I the complete application was <br />reviewed. The applicant has provided an amended survey showing the <br />setbacks of the structures and a hardcover inventory. In the 0- <br />75' setback area there is 344 s.f. or 7.64% hardcover; and in the <br />75-250' setback area there is 4,544 s.f. or 43.28%. Mi Iler <br />provides a reduction of hardcover with a new proposed two sta I I <br />garage proposed at 3,438.95 s.f. with a net reduction of 11% <br />hardcover. There is no change in the 250-500' setback area. <br />Mi Iler explained that the original survey that they were working <br />with was from 1968, which proved to be inaccurate. The main <br />concern of the Planning Commission was that a three car garage was <br />too large for the property and the garage was set off to the side <br />not allowing for direct access into it.· The garage has been <br />switched to a I I ow direct access and has been reduced. <br />Johnson asked about additional removal of hardcover. <br />Mi I I er stated that the garage and grave I ed area around the garage <br />has been reduced. <br />4