Laserfiche WebLink
Any generally straight-line solution in the required area results in <br />destruction of all trees and vegetation in nearly 20% of the lot <br />surface.A cut through the bank and contour slope averaging 14' <br />to 18' in depth over a horizontal distance of approximately140' is <br />necessary. Amounts of soil removed for these scenarios <br />range from 1350 CY to 1700 CY in the 0'-75' zone only. The <br />driveways for these routes average 15% to 16% grade over their <br />entire length, steep by anyone's definition. All surface run-off in <br />the affected area drains to the driveway and heads unimpeded out <br />of the narrow driveway chute directly across the road and into the <br />lake. This is roughly the same line that a skidding automobile <br />would follow on a frozen driveway surface once downward travel <br />on the steep grade began with no bail -out position. <br />Proposal: <br />The solution we propose is a driveway that enters at the eastern <br />edge of the site addressing the concern for sitelines on Bayside <br />Road, but then turns generally to the West and traverses the bank <br />with a gradual 8% straight-line driveway that approaches the <br />natural contour as it approaches the West line. A relief postion <br />( nearly flat ) occurs at this point allowing the driver to turn North <br />and again ascend even more gradually ( 6% grade ) to the rear of <br />the building pad. This second leg follows very nearly the natural <br />contour requiring minimal revision of the existing surface. <br />The benefits of this solution are found in every area of concern. <br />This plan calls for the least soil removal and site revision of the <br />available courses of action. Cuts in the bank average 10' in depth <br />as the driveway crosses the lot requiring the removal of <br />approximately 900 CY. Retaining walls would be installed on the <br />uphill side of the drive as it traverses the bank. Only the minimum <br />number of trees would be lost and the existing vegetation would <br />only be disturbed in the area of the cut and to allow for <br />construction of the retaining walls. The downhill side of the bank <br />would be protected and left undisturbed as much as possible. <br />The surface water run-off would be allowed to drain much as it <br />does now. Water traveling down the West leg of the driveway <br />would able to leave the drive and travel down the bank <br />approximately 50' before reaching the road. Only water moving <br />down the traversing slope would exit directly onto the road. <br />