My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1340 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0015
>
Land Use
>
82-669, PLAT
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2025 2:36:10 PM
Creation date
10/7/2025 2:30:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Jeanne A. Mabusth and Planninq Commission <br />FROM: Alan P. Olson <br />DATE: January 13, 1982 <br />SUBJECT: #669 Tonka Lake Properties - PRD Subdivision <br />1340 Baldur Park Road <br />This is the second application by Gary Peterson for develop- <br />ment of this property. The first, 8466 received preliminary <br />approval for 3 LR-lC single family residential lots on <br />July 13, 1979. That application died without ever having <br />documents returned for final approval. <br />This is the sketch plan application wherein the developer <br />seeks approval of the PRD concept, and the 5 unit density. <br />PRD <br />If -there ever was a piece of property in the City that is <br />appropriate for PRD development, the tip of Baldur Park <br />must be it. There is ample dry land area but it's build - <br />ability is restricted by flood plain and lakeshore set- <br />backs. Clusterinq of the development with open spaces in <br />the setback -flood plain area is a logical scheme to use. <br />Note that building envelopes should still Provide at least <br />20 feet between structures. At least two proposed setbacks <br />are less requiring redesign or hardship documentation. <br />The only real issues to me are density and hardcover. <br />The original scheme had 3 lots, each of which individually <br />exceeded the y acre lot area required. They were served <br />by a private driveway off a new dedicated public cul de sac. <br />That was consistent with CMP policies allowing private <br />driveways to serve 1-3 units. <br />OPEN SPACE <br />T iTi sT creme clusters individual lots of varying sizes. <br />There is no common opnn space except for the proposed <br />private driveway. I would suggest requiring common open <br />space below the 931.5 floodplain elevation with individual <br />lots platted only above that elevation. <br />ACCESS ROAD REQUIREMENTS <br />I ai so note t a ourUNP policies would not allow a 16' <br />wide private driveway to serve more thanTunits. With <br />this 5 unit density, a wider road (at least 24' Paved) <br />with turning facilities for emergency enuipment is required. <br />This could be private in the PRD concept, but the physical <br />improvements must be there to serve this nurber of units. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.