My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1420 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-34-0014
>
Land Use
>
87-1228, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2025 12:11:04 PM
Creation date
10/7/2025 12:09:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Mayor Grabek <br />Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, <br />Assistant Planning 6 Zoning Administrator <br />DATE: December 9, 1987 <br />SDBJ: #1228 Walter R. Wittmer, 1420 Baldur Park Road - <br />Variance - Resolution <br />Zoning District - LR-1C 1/2 Acre Sewered <br />Application - Request for side setback variance and average <br />lakeshore setback variance to construct a second story addition <br />in a side yard and slightly within the 75' lakeshore setback <br />zone. <br />List of Bshibits - <br />A - Proposed Resolution <br />B - Planning Commission Minutes of 11/16/87 <br />C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 11/25/87 <br />D - Memo and Exhibits of November 12, 1987 <br />Pertinent Facts - <br />1. Hardcover: <br />Existing 0-75' = 6.4% with no change proposed <br />Existing 75-250' = 50.4% with no change proposed <br />2. Average '.akeshore Setback encroachment: <br />Existing = 7',no change proposed (existing wing walls <br />on either side of the enclosure location already create <br />a completely opaque second story area, hence, no <br />additional view encroachment will occur). <br />3. Oide Setback variance: <br />Existing first story and proposed second story over it <br />are approximately ..2' from the side lot line. <br />Discussion <br />Please review t memo and exhibits of November 12, 1987. <br />Applicant constructed an 8'x 30' deck a few years after his 1978 <br />variance approval to extend the house. The deck is in violation <br />of that variance approval. At the Planning Commission meeting <br />applicant acknowledged that, having reread the conditions of the <br />1978 variance approval, the deck was not approved. Applicant <br />agrees to remove the 8'x 30' deck as long as he is allowed to <br />keep a 6'x 8' section at the doorway area as an entryway deck, <br />which was approved in 1978. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.