My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
11-28-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2025 9:46:47 AM
Creation date
10/7/2025 9:37:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ionina Fi_a 11333 <br />octorer 7, i988 <br />Paae 3 of 3 <br />San:tary sewer wi! 1 be provided as con_F :�e: b- <br />Enginesr's preliminary review. Sewer to be provided either through <br />Long Lake by the Joint Powers Agreement or by constructing a new <br />interceptor along the Highway 12 corridor. <br />4. The rezoning will allow single Family residential development. <br />5. The property is immediate]:: adjacent to a commercial corridor <br />along Highway 12 and the cr-.:;sed 1 acre zoning would provide an <br />excellent buffer to the surr(• rural residentiaA. districts. <br />6. The Comprehensive Plan Az, nt included this property within the <br />MUSA district and approved Muni. _.;al services for the area. <br />7. The current code will require rezoning to R-lA in order to allow <br />the 1 acre densities recommended in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br />The issue of sewer remains unresolved at this point, but the City <br />Engineer confirms that there are available alternatives for servicing the <br />property with sewer. The question remains how the property will be <br />serviced by sewer either via the Long Lake system or the extension of <br />Orono's Municipal sewer lines. The owner is aware of his obligation to <br />pay for any extension of Municipal sewer to the property. <br />Planning Commission Recos endation - <br />The Planning Commission approved the rezoning of the northern portion <br />of this property from RR-lB to R-lA based on one or more of the findings <br />noted above in the staff memo. The minority opinion denied the rezoning <br />based on the precedent setting aspect stating that they were fearful that <br />the surrounding rural areas would request the same kind of rezoning. The <br />surrounding rural residential properties were not included within this <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment and as a result were not included within the <br />newly aligned MUSA district. There can be no rezoning from RR-lB to R-1P. <br />without sewer. In order to allow the rezoning to a greater density, the <br />City would have to initiate a new Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The <br />enclosed resolution has been drafted approving the rezoning as requested by <br />the applicant authorizing staff to prepare the necessary ordinance amend- <br />ment for formal action by the Council upon final resolve of the extension <br />of sewer to the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.