Laserfiche WebLink
Zonin3 File 41333 <br />October 7, 1988 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Pleasa review Exhi_--= X, sections c' t :e comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />that deal with proposed c':anges for t' e sub ect property. *tote on Page 37 <br />where it specifically references areas slated for change or considered for <br />change and designates the property as Area 4. On Pages 50 and 51 you will <br />find two alternative ;!ins for future de•'e1 c;ment of the rrocert.l. Page <br />the recommended alternative 'cV the C'_ty, approves future rezoning of <br />the 55' corridor north of the existing commercial line be rezoned to <br />commercial and the remaining residential was to receive sewer and to be <br />developed at 1 and 2 acre single family densities. Sewer was to serve all <br />residential development. Please review Exhibit G, the intent of the R-lA <br />code. In c.rder for the applicant's rezoning request to be approved, the <br />property must be sewered. Review Exhibit H, the PRD Code, in order for the <br />applicant to satisfy the current PRD Code of the City and the directives of <br />the Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2, the rezoning to R-lA is necessary. <br />Review PRD Section ?0.32, Subdivision 2 that reads as follows: <br />"Submission of plans. Land owners may submit land subdivision plans <br />for any R District without adherence to minimum lot size recT.�irements <br />for each building lot, provided that the total number of building <br />lots, or dwelling un'_ts, shall not exceed the number of such lots or <br />units permissible under the minimum lot size requirements of the <br />zoning district or districts which such land is situated." <br />In order for this developer to receive approval of a mixed 1 and 2 <br />acre or 1 acre de -pity PRD, the underlying zoning district has to be <br />amended to fulfill ne requirements of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br />The present ?RD subdivision application seeks approval of 25 units <br />based on the R-lA zoning density allowance. Alternative 3, as shown on the <br />Comprehensive Plan Sections, Exhibit R, Page 51, shows a formal <br />conventional plat format. The current plan under consideration is a PRD <br />format with an open space outlot surrounding the PRD providing a buffer and <br />lessening the impact on the surrounding rural residential properties. <br />Please review the Planning Commission minutes of September 19, 1988 <br />enclosed in your Council packets. Some of the reasons noted for approving <br />the rezoning to the 1 acre zone were as follows: <br />1. Topographical and physical characteristics of the site: <br />Variations in topography ranging from 1,04%' at its highest point <br />to 994 at its lowest, resulting in over 50' of grade separation. <br />Mature maple and other deciduous trees. <br />Heavy clay and clay loam soils and associated problems with <br />installation and maintenance of on -site sewage disposal system. <br />2. The proposed division satisfies all of the special minimum <br />requirements for rezoning under the proposed zoning ordinance <br />amendment for the Highway 12 corridor. <br />