My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
11-14-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2025 9:12:02 AM
Creation date
10/7/2025 9:03:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'lb: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: October 10, 1988 <br />Subject: #1329 Thomas McNellis, 355 Woodhill Road - <br />Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Rev -c, Site Plan <br />Exhibit B - Plai.,iing Commission. Action Notice of 9/21/88 <br />Exhibit C - Planning Commission Minutes of 9/19/68 <br />Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 9/14/88 <br />Discussion - <br />The applicants have revised their request by revising deck <br />configurations and the garage orientation, and have moved the house <br />slightly further south, so that the only variance needed is for the front <br />setback at the southeast corner of the house which will be 37' from the <br />front lot line rather than the required 50' setback. The current proposal <br />requires no work in the 26' wetland setback area. <br />Staff Reco�endation - <br />If Planning Commisson feels that the hardships suggested by the <br />a, plicant are valid, and if Planning Commission recommends approval of the <br />revised variance request, staff would suggest the following conditions of <br />approval: <br />1. Any additional encroachments o: changes to the footprint and site plan <br />must be approved by the City. <br />2. Absolutely no grading work is allowed within 26' of the Drainage and <br />Conservation and Flowage Easements. <br />3. Appropriate erosion control measures shall be in place during all <br />phases of construction of this residence, to insure that no sediments <br />enter the wetland. <br />4. Staff would note for <br />the record that <br />necessary grading <br />to accomplish <br />crossing of the drainage <br />easement for construction <br />of the septic <br />system was approved when <br />the lot was <br />subdivided, hence <br />that would be <br />the only grading work <br />anticipated within <br />the drainage easement area. <br />... <br />L/ �v L' i?,: ,' <br />v C G . <br />I <br />TA 1 '� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.