Laserfiche WebLink
B. The plight of landowner is due to circumstances created by <br />the landowner. <br />C. The variances if granted will alter the essential character <br />of the locality, by extending structures closer to the lake than <br />the neighboring properties. <br />D. Economic consideration, including the fact that the structure <br />has already been L•uilt, is not an undue hardship because a <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the conditions <br />allowed by the Zoning Chapter. <br />E. The same conditions applying to the structure in question <br />apply generally to other land and structures in the district and <br />are not peculiar to this property. <br />F. The granting of the variances is not necessary for <br />preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the <br />applicant. <br />G. The granting of the variances would be contrary to the intent <br />of the Zoning Code. <br />H. The granting of the variances would serve merely as a <br />convenience to the applicant but is not necessary to alleviate <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />10. The property owner shall remove the 101x20' deck structure by <br />December 15, 1988. <br />Adopteu by the City Council of the City of Orono this 14th day of <br />November, 1988. <br />ATTEST: <br />Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor <br />f� Page 3 of 3 <br />