Laserfiche WebLink
LMCD Board Minutes <br />October 26, 1988 <br />their deicing permit be reserved for future years. Two persons <br />have made this request for 1988-89. Upon recommendation by the <br />Water Structures Committee, Cochran moved, Rascop seconded that <br />deicing applicants must make their applications with full fee <br />payment annually in order to retain their grandfathered deicing <br />statue. The discussion prompted concern by Directors ranging from <br />waiving the fee when deicing would not be conducted, to charging <br />at least a reasonable administrative registration fee. An amend- <br />ment was offered to charge a $25 administrative fee for this year <br />only, which would not allow deicing. A prospective applicant, <br />under these circumstances, could apply later for deicing, paying <br />the full fees if conditions should so require. The late fee would <br />not be applicable. This amendment was accepted by Cochran and <br />Rascop. The motion to allow previous applicants to serve intent <br />of their not being able to deice by submitting written notification <br />and the $25 administrative fee was approved as recommended. The <br />motion carried unanimously. <br />f) District !boring Area (DMA) Temporary Extensions. The "Dock" Com- <br />mittee recommendation of authorizing the Executive Director to <br />permit a DMA temporary extension doubling the DMA distance or to <br />reach 3' of navigable water whichever is reached first without <br />creating a navigation hazard was reviewed by the Board. The <br />Executive Director requested clarification of the distance that <br />would be referenced in the doubling provision. The distance of <br />each mooring area is set individually by th- Board based upon the <br />DMA application and its individual circumstances. tt was also <br />pointed out that the 3' of navigable water may be inadequate for <br />certain keel boats. Rascop moved, Boswinkel seconded that the <br />temporary extension recommendation be referred back to committee. <br />The motion carried unanimously. <br />g) Lake Frontage Measurement Code Amendment. This subject was re- <br />viewed by the "Dock" Committee with a recommendation that staff <br />develop a Code modification, with legal assistance, taking into <br />account continuous shoreline, not including islands, using wetland <br />shorelands. Since the Water Structures Committee, consultant Dave <br />Arndorfer offered a recommendation to the Lake Use Committee on <br />30-17-88, recommending that no changes be made in the existing <br />method of measuring Lake frontages. This was outlined in a letter <br />provided the Board in advance dated 10-17-88. Arndorfer reasoned <br />his position: <br />1) Changes to existing policy end ordinances should be viewed <br />as interim, in effect, only until the Management Plan is adoped <br />and implemented. Measurement of Lake frontage will be essen- <br />tial to three major areas of the master plan: (1) Shoreland <br />Aesthetics, (2) Lake Access, and (3) Wetlands. <br />2) We are compiling alternatives for determining boat storage <br />in the water or on the land that may affect the number of boats <br />kept in the water at the Lake's shoreline. Four alternative <br />methods were listed. <br />