Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 19, 2009 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />#09-3428 MICHAEL AND MARILYN HUTHW AITE, CONTINUED <br />square feet of hardcover in the driveway and courtyard , there are 3 15 square feet of proposed retaining <br />walls and a proposed foot bridge spanning the creek. <br />Since the earthwork will take place within the creek located within the 0-75 foot zone and exceeds I 0 <br />cubic yards, a conditional use permit is required. The applicants are working with the MCWD on the <br />stream bank stabilization project. <br />The proposed bridge over Stubbs Bay Creek poses a number of issues. First, Orono Code prohibits <br />structures within 75 feet o this protected tributary. Second, the bridge constitutes hardcover within 75 <br />feet of the tributary, which is not allowed . Additionally, the bridge cannot be considered the equivalent of <br />a stairway, lit, landing, or lockbox that would be allowed at the shoreline of a lake because it is not <br />needed for access to the shore due to the presence of a bluff or steep slope. Also, the bridge would appear <br />to function merely as an amenity to the property and does not provide necessary access to a portion of the <br />property that is lacking accessibility because the property south of the creek can be accessed directly from <br />the public roads in the immediate vicinity. There is also a concern that should the creek reach a level that <br />would inundate the bridge of its underpinnings, the bridge could fail and be swept downstream and <br />conceivably contribute to blockage of the culvert under Bayside Road , causing flooding. For all these <br />reasons, Staff recommends that the proposed bridge not be allowed. <br />The Planning Commission should consider the following issues: <br />1. Will the proposed home be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood? <br />2. What is the impact of the creek setback variance on hardcover? <br />3. How does the size of the proposed home impact location as it relates to the setback variances as <br />well as the hardcover variances? <br />4. How may the hardcover impacts be offset? The applicants have proposed native plantings in <br />conjunction with this project between the proposed home and the creek. <br />Precedent has been set regarding approval of the requested lot area variances. The City routinely grants <br />these types ofrequests when no other land is available for acquisition , the lot was legally created prior to <br />adoption of the current zoning standards, and a house existing on the lot when the current zoning <br />standards were adopted. <br />Planning Staff recommends the following: <br />1. Denial of the hardcover variance and structural setback variance to allow the foot bridge. <br />2. Approval of the conditional use permit subject to the MCWD requirements for the stream bank <br />stabilization and the City Engineer's recommendations. <br />3. Approval of the lot area variance conditioned upon the combination of the four lots into one tax <br />parcel prior to the issuance of a building permit and compliance with the wetland buffer <br />requirements. <br />-----------------Page 5